Author
Listed:
- Dan Xu
(School of Architecture and Planning, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China)
- Chengchao Wang
(School of Architecture and Planning, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China)
- Yuling Zhang
(School of Management, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China)
- Yushuang Liu
(School of Management, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China)
Abstract
Rapid economic development in the past four decades in China has brought about significant consequences for people’s livelihoods. Healthy social mobility is fundamental for equality of opportunity, economic vitality, and socioeconomic sustainability. This paper examines the intragenerational livelihood mobility of urban residents in recent decades based on a case study in Guangzhou City and Foshan City, Guangdong Province, Southeast China. Longitudinal livelihood trajectory surveys have been investigated to gain research data. The primary determinants of livelihood mobility were also elucidated through analysis of muti-logistic regression. The results show that five livelihood trajectories are summarized based on their vertical movements in social status. The results further indicate that class polarization exists in urban residents’ mobility. 48.2% of respondents have experienced upward mobility, and 33.6% of them have even stepped over social classes. Meanwhile, the livelihoods of the others remained unchanged or suffered downward mobility. Respondents with male gender, better educational attainments, positive personality, and lower hierarchies of first occupations are associated with a higher probability of upward mobility. These results suggest that wealth redistribution among different social groups should be implemented to promote the benefits of economic growth being shared more broadly, and ultimately to boost socioeconomic sustainability.
Suggested Citation
Dan Xu & Chengchao Wang & Yuling Zhang & Yushuang Liu, 2025.
"A Longitudinal Analysis of Chinese Urban Residents’ Livelihood Mobility Based on Investigation of Livelihood Trajectories,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-16, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11239-:d:1818535
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11239-:d:1818535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.