IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i24p11234-d1818503.html

Analysis of Industrial Flue Gas Compositions and Their Impact on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Performance for CO 2 Separation

Author

Listed:
  • Arkadiusz Szczęśniak

    (Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Heat, Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, 21/25 Nowowiejska Street, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Aliaksandr Martsinchyk

    (Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Heat, Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, 21/25 Nowowiejska Street, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Olaf Dybinski

    (Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Heat, Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, 21/25 Nowowiejska Street, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Katsiaryna Martsinchyk

    (Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Heat, Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, 21/25 Nowowiejska Street, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Jarosław Milewski

    (Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Heat, Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, 21/25 Nowowiejska Street, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Łukasz Szabłowski

    (Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Heat, Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, 21/25 Nowowiejska Street, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Jacob Brouwer

    (Clean Energy Institute, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3550, USA)

Abstract

The study examines the influence of diverse flue gas compositions on the operational parameters and efficiency of MCFCs (molten carbonate fuel cells) as CO 2 separation devices to provide foundational knowledge on MCFC operation under various industrial conditions. MCFCs inherently rely on the presence of CO 2 at the cathode, where it combines with oxygen to form carbonate ions that migrate through the electrolyte; thus, CO 2 acts as a carrier species rather than a fuel, enabling simultaneous electricity generation and CO 2 separation. The findings indicate that MCFCs are most effective when operated with CO 2 -rich flue gases, such as those from coal and lignite-fired power plants with CO 2 contents of roughly 12–15 vol.% and O 2 contents of 2–6 vol.%. In these cases, CO 2 reduction rates of up to 80% can be achieved while maintaining favorable cell voltages. Under such conditions, relevant also for the cement industry (CO 2 between 15 and 35 vol.%), the Nernst voltage can reach about 1.18 V. In contrast, flue gases from gas turbines, which typically contain only 4–6 vol.% CO 2 and 11–13 vol.% O 2 , result in lower Nernst voltages (0.6–0.7 V) and a decrease in efficiency. To address this issue, potential modifications to the MCFC electrolyte are suggested to enhance oxygen-ion conductivity and improve performance. By quantifying the operational window and CO 2 -reduction potential for different sectors at 650 °C and 1 atm using a reduced-order model, the paper provides a technology assessment that supports sustainable industrial operation and the design of CCS (carbon capture and sequestration) strategies in line with climate goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Arkadiusz Szczęśniak & Aliaksandr Martsinchyk & Olaf Dybinski & Katsiaryna Martsinchyk & Jarosław Milewski & Łukasz Szabłowski & Jacob Brouwer, 2025. "Analysis of Industrial Flue Gas Compositions and Their Impact on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Performance for CO 2 Separation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11234-:d:1818503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11234/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11234/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11234-:d:1818503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.