IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i24p11216-d1818204.html

Challenges in Operating a Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC): Translating Biofilm Activity to Electron Flow and Hydrogen

Author

Listed:
  • Naufila Mohamed Ashiq

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates)

  • Alreem Ali Juma Al Rahma Aldarmaki

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates)

  • Mariam Salem Saif Alketbi

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates)

  • Haya Aadel Abdullah Alshehhi

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates)

  • Alreem Salem Obaid Alkaabi

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates)

  • Noura Suhail Mubarak Saeed Alshamsi

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates)

  • Ashraf Aly Hassan

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) are bioreactors that utilize electroactive microorganisms to catalyze the oxidation of organic substrates in wastewater, generating electron flow for hydrogen production. Despite the concept, a persistent performance gap exists where metabolically active anodic biofilms frequently fail to achieve expected current densities by the flow of electrons to produce hydrogen. This review examines the multiple causes that lead to the disconnect between robust biofilm development, electron transfer, and hydrogen production. Factors affecting biofilm generation (formation, substrate selection, thickness, conductivity, and heterogeneity) are discussed. Moreover, factors affecting electron transfer (electrode configuration, mass transfer constraints, key electroactive species, and metabolic pathways) are discussed. Also, substrate diffusion limitations, proton accumulation causing inhibitory pH gradients in stratified biofilms, elevated internal resistance, electron diversion to competing processes like hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis consuming H 2 , and detrimental biofilm aging, impacting hydrogen production, are studied. The critical roles of electrode materials, reactor configuration, and biofilm electroactivity are analyzed, emphasizing advanced electrochemical (CV, EIS, LSV), imaging (CLSM, SEM, AFM), and omics (metagenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics) techniques essential for diagnosing bottlenecks. Strategies to enhance extracellular electron transfer (EET) (advanced nanomaterials, redox mediators, conductive polymers, bioaugmentation, and pulsed electrical operation) are evaluated for bridging this performance gap and improving energy recovery. The review presents an integrated framework connecting biofilm electroactivity, EET kinetics, and hydrogen evolution efficiency. It highlights that conventional biofilm metrics may not reflect actual electron flow. Combining electrochemical, microelectrode, and omics insights allows precise evaluation of EET efficiency and supports sustainable MEC optimization for enhanced hydrogen generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Naufila Mohamed Ashiq & Alreem Ali Juma Al Rahma Aldarmaki & Mariam Salem Saif Alketbi & Haya Aadel Abdullah Alshehhi & Alreem Salem Obaid Alkaabi & Noura Suhail Mubarak Saeed Alshamsi & Ashraf Aly Ha, 2025. "Challenges in Operating a Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC): Translating Biofilm Activity to Electron Flow and Hydrogen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-32, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11216-:d:1818204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11216/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11216/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11216-:d:1818204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.