Author
Listed:
- Sirima Kruadsungnoen
(Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Huay Kaew Road, Muang District, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)
- Auttawit Upayokin
(Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Huay Kaew Road, Muang District, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)
Abstract
Sustainable urban transport planning requires inclusive, high-quality mobility systems that address both user needs and broader environmental objectives. This study examines the service quality and user satisfaction of Chiang Mai University Transit using the SERVQUAL framework and structural equation modeling, based on survey data from 384 student respondents. Seven service quality dimensions—Tangibles, Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy, Environmental Performance, and Respiratory Disease Prevention—were systematically analyzed. The results indicate that Responsiveness has the strongest positive influence on perceived service quality, while Tangibles most significantly shape user expectations. Overall, higher service quality is found to enhance user satisfaction substantially. Nevertheless, a measurable service quality gap persists, especially in the areas of Responsiveness (gap = −0.34) and Respiratory Disease Prevention (gap = −0.26), which are identified as priority areas for targeted improvement. In contrast, Environmental Performance surpasses user expectations (gap = +0.12). These empirical insights underscore the importance of strategically investing in university transit systems to encourage modal shift away from private vehicles, reduce congestion, and improve air quality. The study provides an evidence-based foundation for policymakers and planners seeking to implement integrated and environmentally sustainable mobility strategies within both university and broader urban contexts.
Suggested Citation
Sirima Kruadsungnoen & Auttawit Upayokin, 2025.
"Assessing Service Quality and User Satisfaction in University Transit: Evidence from the SERVQUAL Approach,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-21, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11118-:d:1815874
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11118-:d:1815874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.