IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i24p11086-d1815203.html

Productivity and Resilience of Small and Medium-Sized Aquaculture Enterprises During COVID-19: Evidence from Mexico and Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • José Crisóforo Carrazco-Escalante

    (Unidad Académica de Negocios, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Los Mochis 81223, Mexico)

  • Nissa Yaing Torres-Soto

    (Departamento de Ciencias de la Medicina, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Quintana Roo, Chetumal 77019, Mexico)

  • Elizabeth Ramírez-Llerena

    (Departamento de Derecho, Universidad del Sinú, Cartagena 130001, Colombia)

  • Edgar Fernando Peña-Torres

    (Departamento de Turismo Sustentable, Gastronomía y Hotelería, Universidad del Caribe, Cancún 77528, Mexico)

  • Grace Erandy Báez-Hernández

    (Departamento de Ciencias Industriales, Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Guasave, Guasave 81149, Mexico)

  • Enrique Camacho-Pérez

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida 97000, Mexico)

  • Francisco Guillermo Salcido-Vega

    (Unidad Académica de Negocios, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Los Mochis 81223, Mexico)

Abstract

This study validates and applies a quantitative recommendation scale designed to assess the impact of strategies adopted by small and medium-sized aquaculture enterprises (SMEs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A case study was conducted on the performance of two aquaculture models under crisis conditions: organized shrimp farms in Sinaloa (Mexico) and individual artisanal aquaculture SMEs in El Banco, Magdalena (Colombia). The methodological approach combined a cross-sectional survey, descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alpha, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to evaluate the scale’s reliability and construct validity. Results from Sinaloa revealed strong positive correlations between productivity, market adaptation, technological adoption, and contingency strategies, with the highest association observed between contingency strategies and productivity ( r = 0.91 ). In contrast, SMEs in El Banco exhibited lower integration of technologies and weaker links between strategic responses and productivity, reflecting structural constraints such as informality, limited institutional support, and reduced access to financing. The scale showed an acceptable but preliminary level of internal consistency ( α = 0.64 ) and acceptable factorial indices for an exploratory validation phase. Complementary convergent validity measures (CR and AVE) indicated low internal coherence, which reinforces the preliminary nature of the scale and the need for future refinement. Due to the heterogeneous nature and descriptive treatment of the Colombian data, the cross-country analysis is interpreted as exploratory rather than strictly statistical. Even so, the findings highlight that technological adoption, market diversification, and the implementation of health protocols were decisive for maintaining resilience and productivity during crisis scenarios. This research contributes theoretically, by providing initial evidence supporting an original measurement instrument, and practically, by offering policymakers and entrepreneurs a contextualized diagnostic tool to design evidence-based strategies that strengthen organizational resilience and sustainable productivity in aquaculture SMEs. Further validation in other regions and productive sectors is recommended to confirm the scale’s broader generalizability.

Suggested Citation

  • José Crisóforo Carrazco-Escalante & Nissa Yaing Torres-Soto & Elizabeth Ramírez-Llerena & Edgar Fernando Peña-Torres & Grace Erandy Báez-Hernández & Enrique Camacho-Pérez & Francisco Guillermo Salcido, 2025. "Productivity and Resilience of Small and Medium-Sized Aquaculture Enterprises During COVID-19: Evidence from Mexico and Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11086-:d:1815203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11086/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11086/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11086-:d:1815203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.