IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i24p11032-d1814076.html

The Impact of Controversial Events on Corporate Resilience: The Chain-Mediating Role of ESG and Value-at-Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Zhang

    (School of Business Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, 121 Zhangjialukou, Beijing 100070, China)

  • Derek D. Wang

    (School of Business Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, 121 Zhangjialukou, Beijing 100070, China)

Abstract

In volatile economic environments, corporate resilience is a prerequisite for sustainable development. This study explores the non-linear impact of controversial events on corporate resilience using a sample of 4430 listed Chinese firms from 2018 to 2023. By applying the Double Machine Learning (DML) framework and Generalized Additive Models (GAMs), we uncover a distinct non-linear effect: mild controversies act as “stress tests” enhancing resilience, while severe events diminish it. Furthermore, we validate a novel “Controversial Events→ESG→VaR→Resilience” chain-mediating mechanism, where ESG improvements translate into reduced financial tail risk (VaR). Theoretically, this research bridges the gap between non-financial performance and financial risk management, while methodologically overcoming linear model limitations by pinpointing crisis “tipping points”. Practically, the findings imply that managers should prioritize ESG disclosure as a strategic “risk buffer” to stabilize market expectations. For policymakers and investors, the study suggests that regulatory frameworks and capital allocation strategies must account for the non-linear dynamics of controversies to foster long-term sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Zhang & Derek D. Wang, 2025. "The Impact of Controversial Events on Corporate Resilience: The Chain-Mediating Role of ESG and Value-at-Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-23, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11032-:d:1814076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11032/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11032/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11032-:d:1814076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.