Author
Listed:
- Shini Ooyama
(Department of Industrial and Engineering Systems, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510, Japan)
- Yuna Seo
(Department of Industrial and Engineering Systems, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510, Japan)
- Koichi Maesako
(Ishikawa Brewery Co., Ltd., Fusa City 197-8623, Japan)
Abstract
This study applies integrated LCA–LCC to 1 L of bottled beer at a representative small Japanese brewery using 2024 operational data. Following ISO 14040/44, the cradle-to-gate boundary covers raw materials (excluding agricultural cultivation while including transport and preprocessing), brewing, packaging, and thermal sterilization. The baseline global warming impact is 0.52 kg CO 2 e/L and the cost is JPY 487/L, with single-use glass and labor identified as dominant hotspots. As beer is produced from malt, hops, yeast, and water, this study focuses on how alternative production strategies mitigate sustainability hotspots within this process. Three alternative production scenarios were evaluated within this integrated LCA–LCC model. Scenario 1 (local rice substitution) replaces 30% of the fermentable extract from imported malt with domestically grown rice, changing only ingredient transport and preprocessing within the truncated cradle-to-gate boundary (crop cultivation remains excluded), and yields 0.55 kg CO 2 e/L and JPY 492/L, i.e., a slightly higher global warming impact and cost than the baseline. Scenario 2 (direct sales expansion) assumes that 50% of the beer is sold on site via draft, thereby reducing single-use glass bottles and fuel for pasteurization and achieving 0.29 kg CO 2 e/L (−44%) and JPY 435/L (−11%) in the deterministic model, the best combined environmental and economic performance among the modeled options. Scenario 3 (joint logistics) models cooperative brewing and shared distribution, which improve labor efficiency and modestly reduce transport intensity, delivering 399 JPY/L in the deterministic model; however, Monte Carlo analysis yields a higher expected cost and indicates that these cost savings are not robust. One-way sensitivity analysis identified packaging and labor as the dominant drivers of both environmental and economic performance, while Monte Carlo simulation confirmed the relative insignificance of electricity-related parameters and reinforced the comparative robustness of Scenario 2. Together, these results highlight the most effective leverage points for a sustainable transition in Japan’s craft beer sector, offering the greatest leverage for a more sustainable transition in Japan’s craft brewing sector.
Suggested Citation
Shini Ooyama & Yuna Seo & Koichi Maesako, 2025.
"Assessing Sustainability Trade-Offs in Craft Beer Production Through Life Cycle and Costing Analysis Scenarios,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-17, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11003-:d:1813529
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11003-:d:1813529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.