IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i24p10990-d1813310.html

A Resilience Assessment Framework for Cross-Regional Gas Transmission Networks with Application to Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Zhang

    (Research Institute of Emergency Science, Chinese Institute of Coal Science (CICS), China Coal Technology & Engineering Group (CCTEG), Beijing 100013, China)

  • Kaixin Shen

    (School of Safety Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

As critical national energy arteries, long-distance large-scale cross-regional gas transmission networks are characterized by high operating pressures, extensive spatial coverage, and complex topological structures. Thus, the multi-hazard profiles threatening its safety and reliability operation differ significantly from those of local urban gas distribution networks. This research develops a resilience assessment framework capable of quantifying resistance, adaptation, and recovery capacities of such energy systems. The framework establishes performance indicator systems based on design parameters, installation environments, and construction methods for long-distance trunk pipelines and key facilities such as storage facilities. Furthermore, based on complex network theory, the size of the largest connected component and global efficiency of the transmission network are selected as core topological metrics to characterize functional scale retention and transmission efficiency under disturbances, respectively, with corresponding quantification methods proposed. A cross-regional pipeline transmission network within a representative municipal-level administrative region in China is used as a case for empirical analysis. The quantitative assessment results of pipeline and network resilience are analyzed. The research indicates that trunk pipeline resilience is significantly affected by characteristic parameters, the laying environment, and installation methods. It is notably observed that installation methods like jacking and directional drilling, used for road or river crossings, offer greater resistance than direct burial but considerably lower restoration capacity due to the complexity of both the environment and the repair processes, which increases time and cost. Moreover, simulation-based comparison of recovery strategies demonstrates that, in this case, a repair-time-prioritized strategy more effectively enhances overall adaptive capacity and restoration efficiency than a node-degree-prioritized strategy. The findings provide quantitative analytical tools and decision-support references for resilience assessment and optimization of cross-regional energy transmission networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Zhang & Kaixin Shen, 2025. "A Resilience Assessment Framework for Cross-Regional Gas Transmission Networks with Application to Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:10990-:d:1813310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/10990/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/10990/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:10990-:d:1813310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.