IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i24p10982-d1813234.html

The Impact of and Cut-Off Criteria for Auxiliary Consumables in Quantifying the CFP of Hard Coal: A Case Study of Typical Coal Mines in China

Author

Listed:
  • Erxue Gu

    (National Institute of Clean-and-Low-Carbon Energy, Beijing 102211, China)

  • Xiao Liu

    (National Institute of Clean-and-Low-Carbon Energy, Beijing 102211, China)

  • Weijing Yu

    (Longyuan (Beijing) Carbon Asset Management Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100034, China)

  • Xiangfeng Tian

    (Longyuan (Beijing) Carbon Asset Management Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100034, China)

  • Maosheng Duan

    (Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Enjun Wang

    (CHN Energy Electric Power Marketing Center Co., Ltd., Beijing 100010, China)

  • Tianfeng Feng

    (CHN Energy Electric Power Marketing Center Co., Ltd., Beijing 100010, China)

  • Bo Chen

    (CHN Energy Electric Power Marketing Center Co., Ltd., Beijing 100010, China)

  • Yuna Zhang

    (National Institute of Clean-and-Low-Carbon Energy, Beijing 102211, China)

Abstract

Accurate carbon footprint quantification for hard coal products is essential for the development of low-carbon and sustainable supply chain emissions management. A significant challenge lies in handling the numerous auxiliary consumables used in mining, whose contributions to upstream emissions are often unclear. This study addresses this gap by calculating the cradle-to-gate carbon footprint of hard coal from typical surface and underground mines in China using a life cycle assessment. Confronted with the challenge of accounting for thousands of consumable types, this study demonstrates that economic cost is an ineffective criterion for identifying high-impact items. In contrast, consumable weight shows a strong correlation with emissions and provides a robust basis for cut-off decisions. CFP quantification results obtained using this method show that upstream emissions from other auxiliary consumables (OACs), except for fuel and explosives, account for a significant proportion of the total CFP: 1.64 ± 0.50% (1.02 ± 0.31 kg CO 2 e/t) in a surface mine and 11.63 ± 3.17% (2.91 ± 0.87 kg CO 2 e/t) in an underground mine. Based on three years of requisition data and an emission analysis, a reference list of the OACs that need to be included is provided, which can serve as a reference for determining the cut-off criteria for and system boundary of the carbon footprint of hard coal products and thus promote the better development of sustainable supply chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Erxue Gu & Xiao Liu & Weijing Yu & Xiangfeng Tian & Maosheng Duan & Enjun Wang & Tianfeng Feng & Bo Chen & Yuna Zhang, 2025. "The Impact of and Cut-Off Criteria for Auxiliary Consumables in Quantifying the CFP of Hard Coal: A Case Study of Typical Coal Mines in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:10982-:d:1813234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/10982/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/10982/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:10982-:d:1813234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.