IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i24p10940-d1812415.html

Evaluating Crumb Rubber Modified (CRM) Asphalt as a Sustainable Binder Alternative for High-Friction Surface Treatments

Author

Listed:
  • Abdallah Aboelela

    (Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA)

  • Alireza Roshan

    (Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA)

  • Magdy Abdelrahman

    (Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA)

Abstract

High-friction surface treatments (HFSTs) are widely applied to improve pavement safety by enhancing long-term skid resistance. Although epoxy resins are commonly used due to their strength and durability, their high cost, susceptibility to delamination, incompatibility with substrates of flexible pavements, and adverse environmental concerns limit their long-term performance. This study presents crumb rubber modified (CRM) asphalt as a sustainable alternative binder for HFST applications. CRM binders offer high performance and compatibility with existing pavement surfaces, cost effectiveness and reduced environmental impacts as compared to epoxy binders. In addition, the binder development utilizes enhanced recycling technologies for interacting with used tire rubber with asphalt. The evaluated CRM binders were prepared under varying interaction temperatures, crumb rubber contents, and types. The developed binders were evaluated for friction performance with two aggregate sources, calcined bauxite (CB) and rhyolite (Rhy). Binder characterization included rheological testing conducted through both frequency sweep and temperature sweep procedures. HFST mixes were evaluated using the British Pendulum Test (BPT), the Dynamic Friction Tester (DFT), and the Circular Track Meter (CTM) in collaboration with the Three-Wheel Polishing Device (TWPD) to simulate the traffic-induced polishing effect. The results showed that CRM content influenced binder performance under polishing. CRM asphalt-based HFST with a relatively high CRM content (15%) maintained a greater coefficient of friction (COF) and exhibited polishing resistance, showing low reduction in the COF after the total number of polishing cycles. In contrast, mean profile depth (MPD) analysis revealed that the most macrotexture efficiency was found in binders with a lower CRM content (10%) after completing the total number of polishing cycles. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) showed a significant effect of the interaction conditions and rheological properties of CRM binders on the British pendulum number (BPN) loss due to the polishing process. As expected, aggregate source further influenced the resistance to polishing; CB outperformed Rhy with significantly lower aggregate loss under polishing. Overall, the results confirmed that CRM asphalt binders can effectively serve as a sustainable, flexible, and cost-effective alternative binder in HFST.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdallah Aboelela & Alireza Roshan & Magdy Abdelrahman, 2025. "Evaluating Crumb Rubber Modified (CRM) Asphalt as a Sustainable Binder Alternative for High-Friction Surface Treatments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:10940-:d:1812415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/10940/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/10940/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:10940-:d:1812415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.