Author
Listed:
- Chen Li
(School of Earth Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Xurui Wang
(School of Earth Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Yanjun Ye
(School of Earth Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China)
Abstract
Social media platforms have emerged as a critical infrastructure for disaster communication and emergency management. However, how public opinion varies across platforms during earthquake events and how such differences can inform resilient disaster strategies remain underexplored. This study analyzes public opinion responses to the 2023 M5.5 Dezhou earthquake across three major Chinese social media platforms—Sina Weibo, Bilibili, and Douyin—based on 28,557 posts. By combining Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), Word2Vec, and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), we examine the temporal, spatial, thematic, and emotional patterns of public discourse. The results show (1) a bimodal public attention pattern within 24 h of the earthquake, with platform-specific response timings; (2) spatial clustering of public concern in the epicenter (Shandong) and historically high-risk regions (Sichuan–Chongqing); (3) differentiated topic preferences reflecting platform functions—emotional expression (Weibo), science popularization (Bilibili), and real-time impact sharing (Douyin); and (4) a predominance of positive/neutral sentiment, influenced by user demographics and algorithmic content curation. This study proposes a resilience-oriented public opinion analysis framework aligned with the disaster lifecycle and offers recommendations for platform-specific risk communication, psychological support, and policy planning. Findings contribute to digital disaster governance and the integration of social media analytics into sustainable emergency management.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:10937-:d:1812385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.