Author
Listed:
- Feng Xu
(The School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)
- Ke Fang
(The School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Goertek Inc., Qingdao 266100, China)
- Dong Xiang
(The School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Beijing Key Laboratory of Metal Lightweight Forming Manufacturing, Beijing 100083, China)
- Guiping Chen
(The School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)
Abstract
With the gradual implementation of the EU Battery Regulation and the DBP (Digital battery passport), it has become critical to determine the carbon footprint of lithium-ion battery products that contain recycled lithium resources. However, the diversity of recycling pathways substantially increases the complexity of carbon footprint accounting and DBP construction for recycled lithium batteries. This paper proposes a carbon activity based granular allocation and integration mechanism. Built on organizational operational data in EIS (Enterprise information systems) (ERP (Enterprise resource planning)/MES (Manufacturing execution system)/SCADA (Supervisory control and data acquisition), etc.) and using carbon activities as the linkage for mapping, the mechanism supports the acquisition and sound allocation of product carbon data, thereby improving the availability of carbon data and the rationality of allocation throughout the accounting process, and enabling more robust product carbon footprint calculations. Across different recycling routes, the carbon footprint results for recycled lithium resources can differ by more than 65%. When considering spodumene as the lithium source, mixing primary and recycled lithium carbonate in varying proportions can lead to up to a tenfold difference in the carbon footprint of products containing recycled lithium. Therefore, precisely tracing the carbon emission activities associated with different lithium sources is crucial for enhancing the accuracy of carbon footprint accounting, promoting the sustainable development of lithium resources, and meeting the requirements of the new Battery Regulation and the DBP.
Suggested Citation
Feng Xu & Ke Fang & Dong Xiang & Guiping Chen, 2025.
"Impact Analysis of Different Recycling Pathways for Lithium-Containing Waste on the Carbon Footprint of Products with Recycled Lithium,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-29, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:10886-:d:1810980
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:10886-:d:1810980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.