IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10872-d1810694.html

ELECTRE-Based Optimization of Renewable Energy Investments: Evaluating Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability Through Sustainability Accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Elias Ojetunde

    (Department of Accountancy, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK)

  • Olubayo Babatunde

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4000, South Africa
    Institute of Systems Science, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4000, South Africa)

  • Busola Akintayo

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4000, South Africa
    Institute of Systems Science, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4000, South Africa)

  • Adebayo Dosa

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4000, South Africa
    Institute of Systems Science, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4000, South Africa)

  • John Ogbemhe

    (Department of Systems Engineering, University of Lagos, Akoka 100213, Nigeria)

  • Desmond Ighravwe

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4000, South Africa
    Institute of Systems Science, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4000, South Africa
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bells University of Technology, Ota 112104, Nigeria)

  • Olanrewaju Oludolapo

    (Institute of Systems Science, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4000, South Africa)

Abstract

The shift towards renewable energy demands decision-making tools that unite economic performance with environmental stewardship and social equity. The conventional evaluation methods fail to consider these interconnected factors, which results in substandard investment results. The paper establishes a sustainability accounting system that uses the Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTRE) method to optimize investment distribution between solar power, wind power, and bioenergy systems. The evaluation framework uses six performance indicators, which include cost efficiency and return on investment, together with CO 2 emissions intensity, job creation, energy output, and financial sustainability indicators, like Net Present Value (NPV) and payback period. The barrier optimization algorithm solved the model in 10 iterations, which took 0.10 s to achieve an optimal objective value of 1.6929. The wind energy source demonstrated superior performance in every evaluation criterion because it achieved the highest concordance scores, lowest discordance levels, best payback period, and strongest NPV. The maximum allocation went to wind at 53.3%, while bioenergy received 31.0%, and solar received 16.7%. The optimized portfolio reached a total sustainability index (SI) of 1.70, which validates the method’s strength. The research shows that using ELECTRE with sustainability accounting creates an exact and open system for renewable energy investment planning. The framework reveals wind as the core alternative yet demonstrates how bioenergy and solar work together to support sustainable development across environmental and economic and social dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Elias Ojetunde & Olubayo Babatunde & Busola Akintayo & Adebayo Dosa & John Ogbemhe & Desmond Ighravwe & Olanrewaju Oludolapo, 2025. "ELECTRE-Based Optimization of Renewable Energy Investments: Evaluating Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability Through Sustainability Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10872-:d:1810694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10872/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10872/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10872-:d:1810694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.