IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10869-d1810666.html

Life Cycle Assessment of Asphalt Mixtures Incorporating Secondary Raw Materials Under a Circular Economy Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantinos Mantalovas

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze ed. 8, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Francesco Graziano

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze ed. 8, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Rosalia Teresi

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze ed. 8, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Maria Cristina Mangano

    (Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn—Department of Integrative Marine Ecology (EMI), Sicily Marine Centre, Lungomare Cristoforo Colombo (Complesso Roosevelt), 90149 Palermo, Italy)

  • Gianluca Sarà

    (Laboratorio di Ecologia, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e del Mare (DiSTeM), University of Palermo, 90123 Palermo, Italy)

  • Clara Celauro

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze ed. 8, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

The road construction sector is increasingly striving to reduce its environmental footprint while advancing circular economic goals. Conventional asphalt mixtures depend on virgin aggregates and bitumen, which significantly contribute to emissions and resource depletion. This study addresses the issue by assessing the environmental performance of asphalt mixtures incorporating secondary raw materials—reclaimed asphalt, recycled fishnets, and cellulose fibres. A cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment was conducted on four mixtures, using the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) impact assessment methodology. The results along with the hotspot and sensitivity analyses show that reclaimed asphalt offers the most consistent environmental benefits, notably mitigating climate change and resource depletion impacts by replacing virgin aggregates. Recycled fishnets, despite addressing marine plastic waste, showed higher toxicity and eutrophication burdens due to energy-intensive processing. Cellulose fibres reduced climate impacts but increased land use and terrestrial ecotoxicity. Results highlight that the environmental benefits of introducing recycled materials are incremental rather than transformative at the production stage, and that the influence of supply-chain logistics can outweigh differences among mixtures. Although the cradle-to-gate perspective provides valuable insights for material selection and procurement, future studies should include use and end-of-life phases, where larger environmental benefits may emerge for certain mixtures.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantinos Mantalovas & Francesco Graziano & Rosalia Teresi & Maria Cristina Mangano & Gianluca Sarà & Clara Celauro, 2025. "Life Cycle Assessment of Asphalt Mixtures Incorporating Secondary Raw Materials Under a Circular Economy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10869-:d:1810666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10869/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10869/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10869-:d:1810666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.