IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10855-d1810056.html

Technology-Enabled Traceability and Sustainable Governance: An Evolutionary Game Perspective on Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Xun

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Xuemei Du

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Meiling Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Jianfeng Lu

    (CIMS Research Center, College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Xinyi Bao

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

Ensuring product quality and safety is fundamental to sustainable production and consumption. With the rapid advancement of digital technologies such as blockchain and big data, quality and safety traceability systems have become essential tools to enhance transparency, accountability, and governance efficiency across supply chains. The sustainable functioning of these systems, however, depends on the coordinated actions of multiple stakeholders—including governments, enterprises, consumers, and industry associations—making the study of technological and institutional interactions particularly significant. This paper extends evolutionary game theory to the context of technology-enabled sustainable governance by constructing a tripartite game model involving government regulators, traceability enterprises, and consumers from both technological and institutional perspectives. Unlike existing studies, which focused solely on government regulation, this research explicitly incorporates the role of industry associations in shaping stakeholder behavior and integrates consumer rights protection mechanisms as well as the adoption of emerging technologies such as blockchain into the model. Analytical derivations and MATLAB-based simulations reveal that strengthening reward–penalty mechanisms and improving digital maturity significantly enhance enterprises’ incentives for truthful information disclosure; consumers’ verification and reporting behaviors generate bottom-up pressure that encourages stricter governmental supervision; and active participation of industry associations helps share regulatory costs and stabilize cooperative equilibria. These findings suggest that combining technological innovation with institutional collaboration not only improves transparency and strengthens consumer trust but also reshapes the incentive structures underlying traceability governance. The study provides new insights into how multi-stakeholder coordination and technological adoption jointly foster transparent, credible, and resilient traceability systems, offering practical implications for advancing digital transformation and co-governance in sustainable supply chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Xun & Xuemei Du & Meiling Li & Jianfeng Lu & Xinyi Bao, 2025. "Technology-Enabled Traceability and Sustainable Governance: An Evolutionary Game Perspective on Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-30, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10855-:d:1810056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10855/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10855/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10855-:d:1810056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.