IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10764-d1808216.html

The Threshold of Soil Organic Carbon and Topography Reveal Degradation Patterns in Brazilian Pastures: Evidence from Rio de Janeiro State

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Arão Bila Junior

    (CITAB—Centre for the Research and Technology of Agroenvironmental and Biological Sciences, Inov4Agro, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, UTAD, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Fernando António Leal Pacheco

    (CQVR—Chemistry Center of Vila Real, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Ap. 1013, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Carlos Alberto Valera

    (Regional Coordination of Environmental Justice Promoters of the Paranaíba and Baixo Rio Grande River Basins, Rua Coronel Antônio Rios, 951, Uberaba 38061-150, MG, Brazil)

  • Adriana Monteiro da Costa

    (Department of Geography, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Avenida Antônio Carlos, 6620, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, MG, Brazil)

  • Maria de Lourdes Mendonça-Santos

    (Embrapa Solos—Rua Jardim Botânico, 1024, CEP, Rio de Janeiro 22460-000, RJ, Brazil)

  • Luís Filipe Sanches Fernandes

    (CITAB—Centre for the Research and Technology of Agroenvironmental and Biological Sciences, Inov4Agro, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, UTAD, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • João Paulo Moura

    (CITAB—Centre for the Research and Technology of Agroenvironmental and Biological Sciences, Inov4Agro, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, UTAD, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a key indicator for assessing pasture degradation. This study presents an integrated, field-based approach to analyzing SOC dynamics in pastures of Rio de Janeiro state (Brazil). Unlike methods based exclusively on remote sensing or modeling, our analysis is based on 350 georeferenced soil samples collected by Embrapa Solos and complemented by historical land use data, providing robust and reliable empirical evidence. Statistical methods (ANOVA, Tukey test), geostatistical interpolation (kriging), and unsupervised clustering (k-means) were used to characterize the spatiotemporal distribution of SOC. The results revealed patterns linked to both topographic and anthropogenic drivers, enabling the objective delineation of degraded versus non-degraded pastures. SOC levels below 40 g/kg in areas under 300 m elevation were strongly associated with degradation due to intensive use. In contrast, degradation at higher altitudes was primarily linked to sloping terrain more prone to water erosion. This methodological approach demonstrates the potential of combining field data with data mining tools to detect degradation patterns and inform targeted land management. The findings reaffirm SOC as a vital indicator of soil quality and highlight the importance of sustainable pasture practices in conserving carbon stocks and mitigating climate change. The proposed threshold-based method offers a practical foundation for diagnosing degraded pastures and identifying priority areas for restoration.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Arão Bila Junior & Fernando António Leal Pacheco & Carlos Alberto Valera & Adriana Monteiro da Costa & Maria de Lourdes Mendonça-Santos & Luís Filipe Sanches Fernandes & João Paulo Moura, 2025. "The Threshold of Soil Organic Carbon and Topography Reveal Degradation Patterns in Brazilian Pastures: Evidence from Rio de Janeiro State," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-27, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10764-:d:1808216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10764/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10764/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10764-:d:1808216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.