Author
Listed:
- Huaping Cai
(School of Public Administration, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)
- Xue Wang
(Department of Public Administration, School of Public Administration and Policy, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)
- Enxin Gao
(School of Public Administration, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)
Abstract
In governance systems that face multiple tasks and limited administrative capacity, the allocation of governmental attention is central to policy implementation. Existing studies emphasize institutional constraints and resource scarcity. However, the influence of incentive mechanisms on attention allocation remains insufficiently explored. This study examines how different configurations of incentive mechanisms shape governmental attention. It uses data from veterans affairs in 36 townships in District X between 2020 and 2025. Drawing on official documents, performance rankings and in-depth interviews, the study applies fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify patterns of attention formation. The analysis identifies three configurations of incentive mechanisms that generate high levels of attention concentration. A competition-driven configuration combines value incentives, ranking incentives and performance incentives. An honor compensatory configuration connects honorary recognition with value incentives. This configuration continues to function effectively even when promotion incentives or performance incentives are not available. A configuration that combines honorary recognition, promotion opportunities, value incentives and performance incentives forms the most stable pattern of attention concentration. This combination strengthens officials’ motivation in several dimensions and ensures consistent behavioral responses across different contexts. These results show that governmental attention arises from combinations of incentive mechanisms instead of single instruments. This study examines incentive mechanisms that influence governmental attention allocation. It develops a configurational explanation that integrates attention at the organizational level and at the individual level. The study further proposes a design approach for incentive structures that can improve the efficiency of attention incentives and support effective policy implementation.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10760-:d:1808089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.