IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10755-d1807953.html

How Household Characteristics Drive Divergent Livelihood Resilience: A Case from the Lancang River Source Area of Sanjiangyuan National Park

Author

Listed:
  • Jiajun Cao

    (School of Geographical Science, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China
    Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical Geography and Environmental Process, College of Geo-Graphical Science, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China)

  • Zhiyuan Song

    (School of Politics and Public Administration, Qinghai Minzu University, Xining 810007, China
    Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Bin Xu

    (School of Finance and Economics, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China)

  • Gaoyang Dong

    (School of Geographical Science, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China)

  • Ting Pan

    (School of Geographical Science, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China)

  • Hongbo Ma

    (Qinghai Institute of Public Administration, Xining 810001, China)

Abstract

Enhancing herders’ livelihoods is essential in balancing human–land interactions and promoting inclusive, sustainable development within protected area management. Using a household survey (N = 3539; March–June 2025) and a mixed-methods quantitative approach (weighted TOPSIS, obstacle degree, Spatial Durbin Model, and hierarchical regression), we assessed household livelihood resilience in the Lancang River source area of Sanjiangyuan National Park. Key findings included the following. Overall livelihood resilience was moderate, with a mean score of 0.411. This was characterized by a marked weakness in learning capacity (0.358) and relative strength in self-organization (0.431). Major barriers to resilience included cooperative participation (obstacle degree: 8.14%), education levels (7.58%), skills training (7.18%), household savings (6.40%), and information acquisition abilities (5.97%). The spatial analysis revealed a core-periphery pattern of resilience, evidenced by significant negative spatial autocorrelation (W×HLR coefficient = −0.787, p = 0.001), suggesting competitive interactions among villages. Within this pattern, cooperative participation induced significant positive spatial spillovers (W×X 8 coefficient = 0.147, p < 0.001), while benefits derived from information acquisition abilities remained localized (Direct Effect = 0.061, p < 0.001). The pathways to resilience were associated with household heterogeneity. Associations between key factors and resilience varied across demographic groups, with women and youth benefiting more from skills training and education. Livelihood strategies were linked to information utilization, with cordyceps-dependent households exhibiting greater sensitivity to information acquisition abilities (interaction coefficient = 0.009, p = 0.009). The institutional environment shaped organizational benefits; the positive association with cooperative participation diminished in the core protected zone (interaction coefficient = −0.011, p = 0.036). These findings highlight household heterogeneity as a key factor influencing diverse resilience pathways. They also emphasize the need for targeted, spatially specific, and group-oriented governance strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiajun Cao & Zhiyuan Song & Bin Xu & Gaoyang Dong & Ting Pan & Hongbo Ma, 2025. "How Household Characteristics Drive Divergent Livelihood Resilience: A Case from the Lancang River Source Area of Sanjiangyuan National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10755-:d:1807953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10755/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10755/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10755-:d:1807953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.