Author
Listed:
- Grigorescu Petronela Alice
(Doctoral School of Economics and Humanities, Valahia University of Targoviste, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)
- Liță Andreea Nicoleta
(Doctoral School of Economics and Humanities, Valahia University of Targoviste, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)
- Gălețeanu Florinel
(Doctoral School of Economics and Humanities, Valahia University of Targoviste, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)
- Coman Dan Marius
(Doctoral School of Economics and Humanities, Valahia University of Targoviste, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)
- Valentin Radu
(Faculty of Economics, Valahia University of Targoviste, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)
Abstract
This study examines how sustainability accounting practices are integrated into a Romanian medium-sized enterprise in the context of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), addressing the lack of applied evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. The research uses a qualitative single-case study design based on internal documents, ESG and financial reports, carbon accounting data, and six semi-structured interviews with key organizational actors. The methodological framework includes mapping ESG data flows within accounting systems, applying an extended Return on Investment (eROI) model, and using an internal carbon price to assess the environmental benefits of energy-efficiency investments. The results show a structural transformation of the accounting function, including expanded sustainability-related roles, integration of ESG indicators into budgeting and reporting cycles, and improved transparency in evaluating investment projects. The use of analytical tools strengthened decision-making, increasing the assessed return of the investment portfolio when environmental and operational co-benefits were incorporated. The analysis also identifies key barriers—fragmented data systems, limited ESG expertise, and partial digitalization—and enabling factors such as CFO leadership and cross-functional collaboration. The study concludes that accountants play a strategic role in operationalizing CSRD requirements and demonstrates how SMEs can integrate financial, environmental, and operational metrics to support sustainability-oriented decisions. The findings provide theoretical contributions and practical guidance for organizations seeking to improve sustainability accounting in line with EU regulations.
Suggested Citation
Grigorescu Petronela Alice & Liță Andreea Nicoleta & Gălețeanu Florinel & Coman Dan Marius & Valentin Radu, 2025.
"Sustainable Accounting Under EU Sustainability Regulations: Comparative Evidence from Romania and European Case Studies on CSRD Implementation,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10746-:d:1807709
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10746-:d:1807709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.