IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10739-d1807466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the Risks of Green Financing Water-Energy-Food Nexus Projects in BRICS Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Svetlana Gutman

    (Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Grate Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Maya Egorova

    (Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Grate Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Andrey Zatrsev

    (Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Grate Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Dmitriy Rodionov

    (Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Grate Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Mukesh Kumar Barua

    (Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, Uttarakhand, India)

Abstract

The conceptual foundation of this study is that a country’s exposure to risk when using green bonds as a mechanism for financing sustainable development is shaped by a combination of macroeconomic, market, and social factors. This paper develops and empirically validates a fuzzy-set model to assess national-level risks associated with green financing projects within the Water–Energy–Food (WEF) Nexus in BRICS countries. Building on established theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence, the study conceptualises risk as a function of economic development, the scale of the domestic green bond market, institutional trust, and performance on the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI). The study employs fuzzy-set modelling to integrate these heterogeneous indicators into a unified quantitative risk score. This approach enables cross-country comparison and captures the non-linear nature of relationships between socio-economic and institutional factors. The country sample includes Brazil, Russia, India, and China, which have successively chaired the BRICS association between 2021 and 2025, thereby ensuring methodological consistency and representativeness. The empirical results reveal a clear stratification of green-finance risk levels across the four economies: China demonstrates the lowest risk (Y = 0.243), followed by Russia with a below-average risk (Y ≈ 0.41), while India (Y = 0.53) and Brazil (Y = 0.51) exhibit the highest relative risks. These outcomes highlight the critical role of institutional trust and market maturity in reducing financing uncertainty within the WEF nexus. The study contributes to the literature by integrating macroeconomic, social, and institutional indicators into a unified fuzzy-logic model of green-finance risk; offering a transparent methodology for country-level comparison; and providing policy insights for improving the enabling environment for green bond markets in emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetlana Gutman & Maya Egorova & Andrey Zatrsev & Dmitriy Rodionov & Mukesh Kumar Barua, 2025. "Modeling the Risks of Green Financing Water-Energy-Food Nexus Projects in BRICS Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10739-:d:1807466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10739/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10739/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10739-:d:1807466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.