Author
Listed:
- Guanru Zhang
(College of Ecology and Environment, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)
- Peng Lu
(Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA)
- Hao Tang
(College of Ecology and Environment, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)
- Yi Huang
(College of Ecology and Environment, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)
Abstract
(1) Background: Groundwater numerical modeling education often suffers from passive student imitation, which limits the development of higher-order thinking and knowledge internalization. To address this challenge and promote a shift in instructional philosophy, inquiry-based learning (IBL) was implemented. However, the mechanisms underlying its effectiveness require further elucidation to guide this transformation. (2) Methods: This study was conducted with a cohort of 63 third-year environmental engineering students. It compares the outcomes of the IBL approach, focused on the geometric requirements of grid construction for the control-volume finite-difference (CVFD) method, against those of traditional instruction. (3) Results: The findings demonstrate that IBL’s effectiveness is strongly moderated by students’ prior knowledge. Learners with stronger prior knowledge exhibited a 330% increase in higher-order thinking ( p = 0.04), reflected in a shift toward complex, terrain-adapted Voronoi grids. However, their understanding of core CVFD geometric concepts only improved moderately (34%), reflecting the nonlinear and by-product nature of knowledge acquisition in inquiry-based pathways. In contrast, students with weaker prior knowledge devoted most of their cognitive resources to basic concept understanding, and their limited cognitive schemas constrained their ability to process new information. Therefore, no measurable improvement was observed in either higher-order thinking or conceptual mastery in this group. (4) Conclusions: The key innovation of this study lies in revealing prior knowledge as a critical moderator, highlighting how the effectiveness of IBL depends on its interaction with the learner’s individual characteristics. This mechanistic insight provides a cognitive framework for differentiated instructional design in engineering education, ensuring that pedagogical advancements translate into equitable learning gains.
Suggested Citation
Guanru Zhang & Peng Lu & Hao Tang & Yi Huang, 2025.
"Improving Instruction in Groundwater Numerical Modeling Using Inquiry-Based Learning: Insights from a Grid Construction Case Study,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-15, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10659-:d:1805030
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10659-:d:1805030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.