IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10644-d1804741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil Societies and Disaster Risk Reduction in China: Policy and Literature Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Lian

    (Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Fujisawa 252-0882, Japan
    International Programme Office, Integrated Research on Disaster Risk, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Rajib Shaw

    (Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Fujisawa 252-0882, Japan)

Abstract

This study examines the roles, policy alignment, and challenges of civil society organizations (CSOs) in China’s disaster risk reduction (DRR) efforts post-2008 Wenchuan Earthquake. Using qualitative analysis of national policies, international frameworks, and academic literature, it traces the evolution of Chinese CSOs from peripheral actors to state-integrated partners in disaster risk governance. Findings reveal that China’s top-down system has progressively institutionalized CSOs through Five-Year Plans, enabling their participation in emergency response and community resilience by using technological innovation. However, their contributions remain skewed toward short-term relief, with limited engagement in risk reduction or global humanitarian initiatives. Challenges include fragmented government–CSO collaboration and reliance on informal networks. While CSOs demonstrate growing technical proficiency, systemic barriers—such as funding gaps, weak institutionalized partnerships, and ideological divergences—hinder sustainability. Recommendations emphasize capacity building in risk education, policy literacy, and technology adoption, alongside reforms to formalize cross-sector collaboration and expand international engagement. By addressing these gaps, Chinese CSOs could transition from crisis responders to proactive agents of sustainable resilience, aligning local actions with global DRR agendas. This research offers critical insights for policymakers and practitioners seeking to optimize CSOs’ role in national and local risk governance and invest in their development.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Lian & Rajib Shaw, 2025. "Civil Societies and Disaster Risk Reduction in China: Policy and Literature Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10644-:d:1804741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10644/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10644/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10644-:d:1804741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.