IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10528-d1802019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Structural Resilience of Multi-Mode Transportation Networks in Metropolitan Areas: A Case Study of the Jinan Metropolitan Area, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiguo Shao

    (School of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Anqi Wang

    (School of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Cui Li

    (Department of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology (Linyi), Linyi 273400, China)

  • Zhenghao Li

    (Department of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology (Linyi), Linyi 273400, China)

  • Kexia Liu

    (Department of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology (Linyi), Linyi 273400, China)

Abstract

As a core factor in advancing urban agglomeration development and new urbanization, the structural resilience of multi-modal transportation networks in metropolitan areas directly determines their disturbance resistance during emergencies and their sustainable development. To address the prevalent “core–peripheral” connectivity imbalance in medium-sized metropolitan areas, this study takes the Jinan Metropolitan Area as an empirical case to systematically explore its multi-modal transportation network’s structural resilience. A three-dimensional evaluation framework of “absorbing capacity–buffering capacity–recovery capacity” was built based on complex network theory. Network efficiency was used to measure absorbing capacity, the average number of independent paths was used to characterize buffering capacity, and structural entropy was used to determine recovery capacity. The entropy weight method was used to calculate integrated multi-dimensional resilience values, and a sequential node failure simulation was used to analyze network invulnerability. The main findings are as follows: (1) The Jinan Metropolitan Area’s multi-modal transportation network has “small-world characteristics” but low density, with trunk line coverage gaps. (2) Sub-networks differ significantly. The railway sub-network performs best, the highway sub-network is the weakest, and the composite network achieves resilience balance through multi-modal collaboration. (3) Node failure analysis reveals that “core hubs are resilience pillars, while secondary highway nodes are weaknesses.” The proposed “three-dimensional evaluation framework” provides a methodological reference for resilience quantification in similar metropolitan areas, and the “trunk line densification + peripheral connection” strategy supports the implementation of metropolitan planning policies to promote modern metropolitan transportation systems with efficient commuting and robust disturbance resistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiguo Shao & Anqi Wang & Cui Li & Zhenghao Li & Kexia Liu, 2025. "Evaluation of the Structural Resilience of Multi-Mode Transportation Networks in Metropolitan Areas: A Case Study of the Jinan Metropolitan Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-30, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10528-:d:1802019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10528/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10528/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10528-:d:1802019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.