IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10519-d1801916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fuzzy–AHP Model for Quantifying Authenticity Loss in Adaptive Reuse: A Sustainable Heritage Approach Based on Traditional Houses in Alanya

Author

Listed:
  • Nazmiye Gizem Arı Akman

    (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Akseki Vocational School, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Antalya 07400, Türkiye)

  • Meryem Elif Çelebi Karakök

    (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Türkiye)

Abstract

This study introduces a Fuzzy–AHP–based analytical model for the quantitative assessment of authenticity loss in adaptive reuse practices, addressing a persistent gap in heritage research—the lack of reproducible mathematical frameworks capable of linking authenticity evaluation with sustainability indicators. Unlike previous studies that approach authenticity conceptually or qualitatively, this research develops a hybrid decision-support system that translates both intangible and tangible heritage attributes into measurable linguistic variables, enabling systematic and comparable authenticity assessments. The model was applied to ten traditional houses in Alanya, Türkiye, representing different adaptive reuse types (residential, cultural, commercial, and touristic). A total of 17 experts contributed to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) weighting stage, producing a Consistency Ratio of 0.0156 (<0.10), and 8 experts provided scoring inputs for the fuzzy system. The fuzzy inference system was implemented in MATLAB R2023a, incorporating seven main criteria and three subcriteria, nine input variables, five linguistic categories, and a rule base of 3400 fuzzy rules. Membership functions were defined within the 0–100 numerical range, and the centroid defuzzification method was used to compute final authenticity values. Model reliability was confirmed through Kendall’s W = 0.87, demonstrating strong inter-rater agreement. Results show that buildings retaining their original residential function achieved the highest authenticity scores (Final Score ≈ 86), while structures converted into boutique hotels or restaurants exhibited substantial authenticity losses (Final Score range: 25–45), especially within Group 2 criteria (environment, function, spirit, and intangible cultural heritage). This divergence illustrates a sustainability paradox: although adaptive reuse prolongs building life cycles and reduces embodied carbon, it may simultaneously undermine cultural sustainability when authenticity is significantly compromised. The proposed Fuzzy–AHP authenticity model provides a replicable, transparent, and empirically validated tool for evaluating the effects of functional transformation within a sustainability framework. By quantifying the relationship between adaptive reuse types and authenticity retention, the study contributes to sustainable heritage management research and supports the implementation of SDG 11—Sustainable Cities and Communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Nazmiye Gizem Arı Akman & Meryem Elif Çelebi Karakök, 2025. "A Fuzzy–AHP Model for Quantifying Authenticity Loss in Adaptive Reuse: A Sustainable Heritage Approach Based on Traditional Houses in Alanya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-29, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10519-:d:1801916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10519/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10519/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10519-:d:1801916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.