IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10513-d1801762.html

Comprehensive Value Evaluation of Rural Shared Energy Storage Based on Nash Negotiation

Author

Listed:
  • Jingyi Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment Technology, Chongqing University, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Huaiqing Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment Technology, Chongqing University, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Xingzhe Hou

    (State Grid Chongqing Electric Power Company, Yuzhong District, Chongqing 400014, China)

  • Zhifang Yang

    (State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment Technology, Chongqing University, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400044, China)

Abstract

As a vital support for sustainable energy power systems, shared energy storage has the potential to address challenges in energy storage within rural grids. Nevertheless, the comprehensive value of rural shared energy storage (RSES) exhibits scenario-dependent variations across operation models, and existing studies have neither revealed this sensitivity nor established a scientifically unified evaluation method. This study first identifies typical rural grid scenarios using the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) algorithm and analyzes RSES operation models. Then, this paper creates a three-dimensional evaluation system of RSES based on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concepts that support sustainable development goals. Furthermore, to reconcile conflicts between subjective and objective weights, this paper proposes a combination weighting method based on Nash negotiation, subsequently using an improved technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) for multi-attribute decision-making. Finally, this paper completes simulations and discussions by an improved IEEE 33 bus system. The decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique and sensitivity analysis validate the validity and feasibility of the method proposed from horizontal and vertical dimensions. Based on the results, preferred strategies of RSES currently are energy aggregation and service purchase, for which this study provides recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingyi Wang & Huaiqing Zhang & Xingzhe Hou & Zhifang Yang, 2025. "Comprehensive Value Evaluation of Rural Shared Energy Storage Based on Nash Negotiation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-27, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10513-:d:1801762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10513/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10513/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10513-:d:1801762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.