IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10497-d1801300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management Practices and Consumption Patterns of Small Ruminants in the Fiji Islands

Author

Listed:
  • Prethy P. Swarath

    (Department of Animal Science, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Fiji National University, Nasinu P.O. Box 7222, Fiji)

  • Archibold G. Bakare

    (Department of Animal Science, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Fiji National University, Nasinu P.O. Box 7222, Fiji)

  • Paul A. Iji

    (Department of Animal Science, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Fiji National University, Nasinu P.O. Box 7222, Fiji)

  • Titus J. Zindove

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand)

Abstract

Despite their importance to Fiji’s food security due to their adaptability and ease of production, the production practices of sheep and goats in Fiji are not well understood. This study characterized small ruminant production systems and determined the meat consumption patterns in Fiji Islands. Data were collected from 270 sheep and goat producers in Fiji’s two main islands, Viti Levu and Vanua Levu, using a structured questionnaire that captured socio-demographic information, the importance of small ruminants to farmers, challenges faced, management practices, and household meat consumption patterns. Associations between geographical location and production practices were determined using the chi-squared option of PROC FREQ and logistic regression. Over 95% of the farmers in both islands used paddocking as their primary management strategy. Hindu farmers were four times more likely to use paddocks for raising sheep and goats than Muslim farmers ( p < 0.05). More than 65% of the farmers reported scabby mouth and foot rot as primary diseases in Vanua Levu, compared to less than 30% in Viti Levu. In Vanua Levu, the preferred age for slaughtering sheep and goats was less than one year, whereas in Viti Levu, it was one and a half years ( p < 0.05). Most farmers discarded offal and other byproducts, such as skin and blood. Management practices and meat consumption patterns were similar in Viti Levu and Vanua Levu; however, the age of slaughter for small ruminants differed.

Suggested Citation

  • Prethy P. Swarath & Archibold G. Bakare & Paul A. Iji & Titus J. Zindove, 2025. "Management Practices and Consumption Patterns of Small Ruminants in the Fiji Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10497-:d:1801300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10497/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10497/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10497-:d:1801300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.