IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10491-d1801055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Green Building Certification Systems for Schools

Author

Listed:
  • Izel Akyel

    (Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Architecture, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli 41001, Turkey
    Department of Design, Interior Design Program, Dogus University, Istanbul 34775, Turkey)

  • Ruveyda Komurlu

    (Department of Architecture, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli 41001, Turkey)

  • David Arditi

    (Illinois Institute of Technology, Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Chicago, IL 60616, USA)

Abstract

The concept of green building has become important, as sustainability issues have been acknowledged in the construction industry. Green building certification systems have emerged to measure the sustainability of buildings. While there are numerous studies on green building certification systems, studies evaluating green schools are quite limited, even though green schools not only ensure the health and comfort of students and teachers but also play a role in raising sustainability awareness, especially among growing children. First, a detailed literature review was conducted in this study that identified eight common issues, namely “project management processes”, “land selection and transportation/location”, “energy”, “indoor environmental quality”, “water”, “waste”, “materials” and “innovation”, which were extensively used to evaluate green schools. Four green building certification systems that emerged in developing countries and four systems that existed in advanced countries were compared relative to these eight issues. The weaknesses of the eight certification systems and the fundamental differences between advanced and developing countries were identified, and suggestions for improvements were presented. It was concluded that it is not enough to consider green schools only as buildings that rely on sustainable design and construction but also as important institutions that contribute to the adoption of the concept of sustainability. Consequently, it was found that it is important to create special green certification systems for schools.

Suggested Citation

  • Izel Akyel & Ruveyda Komurlu & David Arditi, 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of Green Building Certification Systems for Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-34, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10491-:d:1801055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10491/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10491/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10491-:d:1801055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.