IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10483-d1800765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond Self-Certification: Evaluating the Constraints and Opportunities of Participatory Guarantee Systems in Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Bregolin

    (Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso 35, 10125 Torino, Italy)

  • Gaetano Cardone

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Ambientali, Università di Torino, Largo Braccini, 2, 10095 Torino, Italy)

  • Lorenzo Brunetti

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Ambientali, Università di Torino, Largo Braccini, 2, 10095 Torino, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Cannizzaro

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Ambientali, Università di Torino, Largo Braccini, 2, 10095 Torino, Italy)

  • Cristiana Peano

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Ambientali, Università di Torino, Largo Braccini, 2, 10095 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) have emerged in Latin America as an alternative to conventional market-driven certification, offering a community-based framework to validate sustainable agricultural and social practices. Rooted in collective responsibility and dialogue between producers, consumers, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and state institutions, PGS aim to empower smallholders by reducing certification costs and strengthening agroecological transitions. This review examines their development across diverse Latin American contexts, highlighting both their innovative potential and the persistent challenges that limit their scalability and formal recognition. A literature-based approach combined with a stakeholder analysis was employed, integrating case studies from Brazil, Peru, Mexico, Bolivia, and other countries. To systematize findings, SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) and TOWS (Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, Strengths) frameworks were applied, assessing strengths and weaknesses from the perspective of producers and consumers and formulating strategies to enhance resilience and legitimacy. Results show that PGS foster social capital, technical learning, and access to local markets; however, they are constrained by high time commitments, reliance on voluntary labour, uneven participation, and limited consumer awareness. The analysis indicates that the most promising pathway is a combination of growth strategies, including leveraging short supply chains, community-based fairs, and digital platforms, with recovery strategies centred on consumer education and producer capacity building. More conservative strategies remain crucial in specific contexts: redistributing workloads, introducing compensation for administrative tasks, and strengthening conflict mediation can help preserve system viability when engagement or resources are scarce. Defence strategies, aimed at reinforcing autonomy and reducing dependence on external actors, are better conceived as long-term goals under current conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Bregolin & Gaetano Cardone & Lorenzo Brunetti & Fabrizio Cannizzaro & Cristiana Peano, 2025. "Beyond Self-Certification: Evaluating the Constraints and Opportunities of Participatory Guarantee Systems in Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10483-:d:1800765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10483/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10483/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10483-:d:1800765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.