IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10452-d1800180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Evaluating the Effects of Digital Construction in Comprehensive Museums: A Collaborative Evaluation Approach Based on Cultural Cycle Theory and Grounded Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Qi

    (College of Management Science and Engineering, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100192, China
    Beijing Key Laboratory of Green Development Big Data Decision-Making, Beijing 100192, China
    Key Scientific Research Base of the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Cultural Heritage, Beijing 100192, China)

  • Jinfeng Tang

    (College of Management Science and Engineering, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100192, China
    Key Scientific Research Base of the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Cultural Heritage, Beijing 100192, China
    Beijing Research Base for Knowledge Management, Beijing 100192, China)

  • Jiaxin Zhang

    (College of Management Science and Engineering, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100192, China
    Key Scientific Research Base of the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Cultural Heritage, Beijing 100192, China
    Beijing Research Base for Knowledge Management, Beijing 100192, China)

  • Jian Zhang

    (College of Management Science and Engineering, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100192, China
    Key Scientific Research Base of the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Cultural Heritage, Beijing 100192, China
    Beijing Research Base for Knowledge Management, Beijing 100192, China)

Abstract

At present, the digital construction of museums has created a novel cultural ecosystem that integrates digital preservation of cultural heritage, intelligent management, immersive experiences, and cloud-based services. However, insufficient synergistic integration of technological applications constrains the comprehensive release of the digital construction’s efficacy, while the absence of cultural assessment dimensions hinders the effective articulation of mechanisms whereby digital technology empowers cultural innovation. These concerns collectively constitute the primary impediments hindering museums from attaining sustainable development. The effectiveness of museum digital construction is fully clarified by combining grounded theory qualitative research methods with cultural cycle theory in this study. The Analytic Network Process (ANP) is used to manage interdependent relationships between factors, and cloud models are used to clarify indicator ambiguity, which allows for accurate assessment of digital construction results, consequently bolstering the sustainability of museum digitalization initiatives. The developed ‘qualitative–quantitative’ collaborative evaluation methodology for museum digital construction includes three sub-objectives: technology embedding, value co-creation, and institutional adaptation, as well as five primary indicators and ten secondary indicators. An empirical analysis of the ‘Smart Jiangxi Museum’ digital construction initiative at the Jiangxi Provincial Museum in China indicates that the project has achieved an ‘excellent’ standard. The findings of a previous qualitative study are effectively supported by this conclusion. This study presents a systematic approach for museum evaluation and gives decision-making guidance for museums to attain sustainable use of cultural resources, promote social knowledge transmission, and facilitate green, low-carbon transformation of operational models in the digital era.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Qi & Jinfeng Tang & Jiaxin Zhang & Jian Zhang, 2025. "Research on Evaluating the Effects of Digital Construction in Comprehensive Museums: A Collaborative Evaluation Approach Based on Cultural Cycle Theory and Grounded Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10452-:d:1800180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10452/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10452/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10452-:d:1800180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.