IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i23p10440-d1799992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating ESG Practices from the Perspective of Transparency and Accountability Through Clustering Analysis and MCDM Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Neylan Kaya

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Türkiye)

  • Aslıhan Ersoy Bozcuk

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Türkiye)

  • Burçin Tutcu

    (Korkuteli Vocational School, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07800, Türkiye)

  • Mustafa Terzioğlu

    (Korkuteli Vocational School, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07800, Türkiye)

  • Güler Ferhan Ünal Uyar

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Türkiye)

Abstract

This study explores the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure practices of 31 information technology firms listed on Borsa Istanbul (BIST), with a particular emphasis on transparency and accountability. Building on legitimacy, stakeholder, and signalling theories, the study develops a composite ESG disclosure index based on 18 binary indicators covering strategy, environmental performance, social impact, stakeholder engagement, and governance structures. Each indicator is equally weighted and combined into environmental, social, and governance sub-indices, which are then aggregated into a firm-level ESG disclosure score using a single min–max normalisation scheme. K-means clustering, validated through the elbow method and silhouette coefficient, is applied to identify groups of firms with similar ESG disclosure profiles. The empirical results show substantial heterogeneity in disclosure intensity across Turkish IT firms. A small group of companies exhibits proactive and comprehensive ESG communication, whereas many firms disclose only limited and fragmented information. Governance- and reporting-related indicators (C6 and C7) are particularly influential, underscoring the importance of standardised ESG reporting and board-level oversight in strengthening transparency. The study contributes to the emerging ESG disclosure literature by providing a methodologically consistent framework for assessing ESG transparency in the IT sector and offering practical insights for regulators, investors, and corporate decision-makers aiming to improve the reliability of ESG reporting in Turkey.

Suggested Citation

  • Neylan Kaya & Aslıhan Ersoy Bozcuk & Burçin Tutcu & Mustafa Terzioğlu & Güler Ferhan Ünal Uyar, 2025. "Evaluating ESG Practices from the Perspective of Transparency and Accountability Through Clustering Analysis and MCDM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10440-:d:1799992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10440/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10440/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:23:p:10440-:d:1799992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.