IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i22p9948-d1789759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mine Emergency Rescue Capability Assessment Integrating Sustainable Development: A Combined Model Using Triple Bottom Line and Relative Difference Function

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Feng

    (Key Laboratory of Safe and Efficient Mining of Rare Metal Resources in Jiangxi Province, Ganzhou 341000, China
    School of Safety Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
    Ganzhou Innovation Center for Comprehensive Emergency Technology of Multi-Disasters, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Jing Xie

    (Key Laboratory of Safe and Efficient Mining of Rare Metal Resources in Jiangxi Province, Ganzhou 341000, China
    School of Safety Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
    Ganzhou Innovation Center for Comprehensive Emergency Technology of Multi-Disasters, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Yuxian Ke

    (Key Laboratory of Safe and Efficient Mining of Rare Metal Resources in Jiangxi Province, Ganzhou 341000, China
    School of Safety Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
    Ganzhou Innovation Center for Comprehensive Emergency Technology of Multi-Disasters, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
    Yichun Lithium New Energy Industry Research Institute, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Yichun 336000, China)

Abstract

Assessing Mine Emergency Rescue Capability (MERC) is critical for ensuring mining safety and advancing sustainable development. However, existing MERC assessments often lack a holistic sustainability perspective. To bridge this gap, this study develops a MERC assessment model grounded in the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) framework, integrating the relative difference function (RDF) to address the fuzziness and subjectivity in evaluation processes. A hierarchical indicator system is constructed, comprising 5 primary factors and 25 sub-indicators across environmental, economic, and social dimensions, reflecting both immediate rescue effectiveness and long-term sustainability performance. Indicator weights are derived from a hybrid approach that combines the subjective G1 method with the objective entropy weight method. RDF is employed to compute membership degrees, and the final MERC level is determined by level characteristic values. The model is validated through an empirical study of six green mines in China. Results demonstrate robust performance and consistency with alternative methods and reveal the environmental dimension as the dominant driver within the TBL framework. This finding supports the ecology-first principle of green mining and underscores the alignment of high-level emergency preparedness with sustainable development objectives. By explicitly embedding sustainability principles into safety assessment, the proposed model provides a scientifically grounded tool to guide the green transformation of the mining industry. Future work will adapt the model to diverse mining contexts and refine the indicators to better support global sustainability goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Feng & Jing Xie & Yuxian Ke, 2025. "Mine Emergency Rescue Capability Assessment Integrating Sustainable Development: A Combined Model Using Triple Bottom Line and Relative Difference Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-25, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:9948-:d:1789759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/9948/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/9948/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:9948-:d:1789759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.