Author
Listed:
- Virajith Kuruppu
(Department of Agribusiness Management, Faculty of Agriculture & Plantation Management, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Makadura 60170, Sri Lanka)
- Nirma Subashini
(Department of Horticulture & Landscape Gardening, Faculty of Agriculture & Plantation Management, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Makadura 60170, Sri Lanka)
- Lahiru Udayanga
(Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture & Plantation Management, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Makadura 60170, Sri Lanka)
- Navoda Erabadupitiya
(Department of Agribusiness Management, Faculty of Agriculture & Plantation Management, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Makadura 60170, Sri Lanka)
- Hasini Ekanayake
(Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture & Plantation Management, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Makadura 60170, Sri Lanka)
- Mohamed M. M. Najim
(Faculty of Agriculture, Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University (UNISSA), Kampus Sinaut, Km 33, Jln Tutong, Tutong TB1741, Brunei)
- Savinda Arambawatta Lekamge
(International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health (ILAQH), School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)
- Bader Alhafi Alotaibi
(Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Society, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)
Abstract
Agriculture is one of the many sectors facing significant risks from climate change. To manage potential crop losses, whether climate-related or not, farmers widely rely on crop insurance to increase their resilience. However, farmers in Sri Lanka demonstrate a limited acceptance of crop insurance schemes. This study aimed to investigate the perceptions and Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) for crop insurance schemes among the paddy farmers in Kurunegala district. A total of 248 paddy farmers from the Kurunegala district were recruited as the study sample using the stratified random sampling approach. A pre-tested structured questionnaire and choice cards were used for primary data collection. The Conditional Logit Model (CLM) was used for data analysis. Around 77.8% of respondents were males engaged only in paddy farming, while the majority (62.5%) received an income of LKR 50,000 to 75,000. Complications experienced during the claim form-filling process (mean = 4.6), gaps in covering all crops on the crop land (mean = 4.6), and poor service quality (mean = 4.5) were perceived as the major limitations in existing crop insurance schemes. Outcomes of the CLM indicated that farmers with a positive attitude toward crop insurance significantly prefer plans with drought coverage (β = 0.823; p < 0.05), on-field assessments (β = 0.251; p < 0.05), and higher no-hazard returns (β = 0.318; p < 0.05) while showing a notable sensitivity to premium costs (β = −0.590; p < 0.05). The model also revealed an apparent willingness to switch from the status quo when presented with better-designed alternatives. The findings emphasized the need to implement responsive crop insurance schemes to enhance climate resilience and ensure the sustainability of paddy production in Sri Lanka.
Suggested Citation
Virajith Kuruppu & Nirma Subashini & Lahiru Udayanga & Navoda Erabadupitiya & Hasini Ekanayake & Mohamed M. M. Najim & Savinda Arambawatta Lekamge & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi, 2025.
"From Risk to Resilience: Willingness-to-Pay for Crop Insurance Among Paddy Farmers in the Kurunegala District, Sri Lanka,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-19, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10389-:d:1798681
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10389-:d:1798681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.