Author
Listed:
- Giedrė Lapinskienė
(Faculty of Economics, VIKO Higher Education Institution, Saltoniškiu ̨58, LT-08105 Vilnius, Lithuania)
- Irena Danilevičienė
(Faculty of Economics, VIKO Higher Education Institution, Saltoniškiu ̨58, LT-08105 Vilnius, Lithuania)
- Genė Achranovič
(Faculty of Economics, VIKO Higher Education Institution, Saltoniškiu ̨58, LT-08105 Vilnius, Lithuania)
- Aušra Liučvaitienė
(Faculty of Economics, VIKO Higher Education Institution, Saltoniškiu ̨58, LT-08105 Vilnius, Lithuania)
Abstract
The importance of sustainability continues to grow, and various standards now combine to form an important mechanism that underpins the entire sustainability management system. These standards originate from five main international organisations and standard-setting bodies: (1) The Climate Disclosure Project, (2) The Climate Disclosure Standards Board, (3) The Global Reporting Initiative, (4) The International Integrated Reporting Council, and (5) The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. In addition to these specific bodies, the European Union issues The European Sustainability Reporting Standards. Digitisation is a key tool to improve the measurement and monitoring of sustainability. In Lithuanian financial institutions, ERP, Clarity AI, and artificial intelligence are critical tools alongside external ESG rating providers such as MSCI ESG, Sustainalytics, Refinitiv, and Bloomberg. Existing research often focuses on large multinational institutions or EU-level policy, with limited attention paid to how financial companies address the practical challenges of sustainability—particularly in Lithuania. This article addresses this gap in the research, consulting seven experts to explore the performance of financial companies, their use of sustainability standards, and the key challenges encountered during implementation. To achieve these aims, a structured survey analysing the issues posed by sustainability management is presented, with a particular focus on using standards to discuss problems in this area through exploratory analysis. The interviews produce insights that can help shape the future of sustainability management from the perspectives of both stakeholders and policymakers, as well as providing promising directions for future research.
Suggested Citation
Giedrė Lapinskienė & Irena Danilevičienė & Genė Achranovič & Aušra Liučvaitienė, 2025.
"Sustainability Management and Standardisation: The Expert Approach of Lithuanian Financial Service Companies,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-27, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10376-:d:1798528
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10376-:d:1798528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.