Author
Listed:
- Jun Dong
(Cold Region Wetland Ecology and Environment Research Key Laboratory of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin University, Harbin 150086, China)
- Xiongwei Liang
(Cold Region Wetland Ecology and Environment Research Key Laboratory of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin University, Harbin 150086, China)
- Baolong Du
(Cold Region Wetland Ecology and Environment Research Key Laboratory of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin University, Harbin 150086, China)
- Yongfu Ju
(Cold Region Wetland Ecology and Environment Research Key Laboratory of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin University, Harbin 150086, China)
- Yingning Wang
(Cold Region Wetland Ecology and Environment Research Key Laboratory of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin University, Harbin 150086, China
State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150086, China)
- Huabing Guo
(Forest Inventory and Planning Institute of Jilin Province, Changchun 132013, China)
Abstract
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are central to spatial evidence in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). In this review, GIS is used in a broad, integrative sense to refer to an ecosystem of geospatial technologies—such as remote sensing (RS) and GPS—where GIS serves as the core platform for managing, analyzing, and communicating spatial data throughout the EIA process. GIS plays a crucial role at each stage of EIA, from baseline data collection to spatial analysis, ecological sensitivity mapping, impact prediction, scenario simulation, and landscape connectivity assessment. These capabilities support alternatives analysis, risk communication, and decision-making in EIA. This paper synthesizes thematic evidence and presents case studies to illustrate the synergies between GIS, remote sensing, GeoAI, and multisource data fusion. It highlights operational workflows and key deliverables for EIA applications, including urban expansion, transport corridors, and protected-area management. We identify persistent challenges in data quality and standardization, interoperability, model uncertainty, and policy gaps. To address them, we propose a minimum geospatial dataset with clear metadata standards, interpretable GeoAI paired with formal sensitivity analysis, IoT–GIS pipelines for real-time monitoring and adaptive management, and the systematic inclusion of cumulative effects and climate scenarios. By linking GIS methods to typical decision points and reporting standards in EIA, this review clarifies where GIS adds value, how to quantify and communicate uncertainty, and how to align analytical outputs with regulatory requirements and stakeholder expectations. The study offers a practical framework and implementation checklist for standardized, transparent, and reproducible EIA processes, contributing to evidence-based ecological governance.
Suggested Citation
Jun Dong & Xiongwei Liang & Baolong Du & Yongfu Ju & Yingning Wang & Huabing Guo, 2025.
"Applications of Geographic Information Systems in Ecological Impact Assessment: A Methods Landscape, Practical Bottlenecks, and Future Pathways,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-25, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10358-:d:1798087
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10358-:d:1798087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.