IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i22p10330-d1797555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Wagner’s Law Based on Government Functions: Is There Evidence of Quality of Public Finances Regarding Sustainability?

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Južnik Rotar

    (Faculty of Economics and Informatics, University of Novo Mesto, Na Loko 2, 8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia)

Abstract

The issue of the quality of public finances is gaining importance in light of long-term fiscal sustainability challenges. The Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) can play a role in improving the quality of public finances by reshaping the composition of general government expenditure by function and supporting the economy’s long-term growth potential. This paper analyses the validity of Wagner’s law for Euro area countries and examines the evidence on the quality of public finances based on productive government expenditure. The quantitative approach is based on panel data approaches. The results do not confirm the validity of Wagner’s law. However, they indicate that the RRF, as an instrument of exogeneous fiscal intervention, has contributed to a shift in the composition of government expenditure, thereby providing some evidence of an improvement in the quality of public finances. Given that the RRF is a temporary, performance-based programme, it represents—at best—a temporary form of exogeneous fiscal intervention on the quality of public finances, which, upon its completion and ceteris paribus, will remain within the domain of the Member States.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Južnik Rotar, 2025. "Testing Wagner’s Law Based on Government Functions: Is There Evidence of Quality of Public Finances Regarding Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10330-:d:1797555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10330/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10330/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10330-:d:1797555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.