Author
Listed:
- Bryn Kearney
(Environmental Studies & Sciences Program, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074, USA
All authors contributed equally to this study. As the junior author, B. Kearney is listed first.)
- John E. Petersen
(Environmental Studies & Sciences Program and Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074, USA
All authors contributed equally to this study. As the junior author, B. Kearney is listed first.)
- Cynthia McPherson Frantz
(Department of Psychology and Environmental Studies Program, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074, USA
All authors contributed equally to this study. As the junior author, B. Kearney is listed first.)
Abstract
Most U.S. residents are concerned about and support action on climate change. They also overwhelmingly underestimate the extent to which others are likewise concerned, a phenomenon known as pluralistic ignorance. This is a problem because when individuals perceive that others don’t care, they are less likely to take action themselves. We assessed whether brief exposure to positive thoughts and actions of others might make climate action more normative and increase support for climate policy. Specifically, we exposed people to “Community Voices” (CV), a form of social media designed to promote pro-environmental and pro-social norms. We hypothesized that exposure to CV content (related and unrelated to climate change) would enhance positive climate-related norms and increase climate policy support. We further hypothesized that this shift would be stronger when the content was directly related to climate change and when the content came from participants’ geographic region. Online recruits (N = 969) from national and regional (Northeast Ohio) samples were exposed to either no CV content (control), pro-social CV content (unrelated to climate) or CV content depicting climate action in NE Ohio. Brief exposure to both pro-social and climate action-focused CV content increased both descriptive and prescriptive climate action norms and significantly decreased participants’ psychological distance from climate change. As expected, exposure to climate-focused content increased descriptive norms more than exposure to pro-social content. Pro-social CV content increased policy support. That increase was explained by increased norms and decreased psychological distance. Pro-social CV content significantly increased positive emotions, while climate-focused CV content did not. NE Ohio participants who viewed regional climate-focused content exhibited lower positive emotions and had more difficulty imagining a positive future than those in the national sample. Results suggest that exposure to positive thoughts and actions of others can achieve the critical goals of elevating descriptive norms (thereby reducing pluralistic ignorance) and elevating support for climate policy. However, the psychological impact of exposing people to positive climate-action content is nuanced and complex.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10318-:d:1797390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.