Author
Listed:
- Qiao Meng
(School of Economics and Management, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China)
- Daniel Knapp
(Liechtenstein Business School, University of Liechtenstein, Fürst-Franz-Josef-Strasse, 9490 Vaduz, Liechtenstein)
- Leo Brecht
(Liechtenstein Business School, University of Liechtenstein, Fürst-Franz-Josef-Strasse, 9490 Vaduz, Liechtenstein)
- Roland Eckert
(School of Economics and Management, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China)
Abstract
The increasing importance of sustainability reporting requires a deeper understanding of how companies communicate their sustainability efforts across regions and sectors. This study focuses on China and the United States as subjects. By analyzing corporate sustainability reports from these two major economies in 2022, it evaluates the effects of regional and sectoral differences on sustainable practices, with the aim of deepening the understanding of organizational sustainability. Using topic modeling, this study identified the key topics and patterns that companies in the two countries prioritize in their corporate sustainability reporting. A bag-of-words approach was adopted to analyze the attitudes of corporations in two countries toward environmental, social, and governance dimensions, with a focus on sector-specific differences. Finally, sentiment analysis with ClimateBERT assessed the tone of the reports. The findings reveal similarities and sector-specific differences in corporate sustainability reporting between China and the United States, as well as displaying divergent emphases on climate-related risks and opportunities. This study offers a multi-method approach to evaluating corporate sustainability reporting, contributing to a better understanding of sustainability practices in different national and industrial contexts, and offering effective guidance for actual industry regulators and stakeholders.
Suggested Citation
Qiao Meng & Daniel Knapp & Leo Brecht & Roland Eckert, 2025.
"A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Multi-Method Approach to China and the United States,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-21, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10315-:d:1797355
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10315-:d:1797355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.