Author
Listed:
- Yunyan Li
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Key Laboratory of New Technique for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400045, China
Key Laboratory of Monitoring, Evaluation and Early Warning of Territorial Spatial Planning Implementation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Chongqing 401147, China
School of Architecture, State Key Lab of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)
- Menghan Gou
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Key Laboratory of New Technique for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400045, China)
- Yanhong Wang
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Key Laboratory of New Technique for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400045, China)
- Binyan Wang
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Key Laboratory of New Technique for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400045, China)
- Chenhao Fang
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Key Laboratory of New Technique for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400045, China
Key Laboratory of Monitoring, Evaluation and Early Warning of Territorial Spatial Planning Implementation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Chongqing 401147, China)
- Ziyi Wang
(Graduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan)
- Tarek Rahmoun
(Faculty of Architectural Engineering, Latakia University, The 7th Project, Tartous City, Syria)
Abstract
As urban disasters intensify, the relationship between urban spatial form and disaster risk is increasingly important. Different spatial configurations reflect varying levels of resilience to disasters. However existing research offers limited quantitative evidence linking spatial form indicators and disaster risk indices. This study addresses this gap by developing a quantifiable, city-scale framework to analyze the form–risk relationship across 32 Chinese cities. Urban spatial form is quantified using fractal dimension to measure boundary complexity and compactness to assess internal structure, supplemented by a diagrammatic classification of urban patterns. A comprehensive disaster risk index is developed based on four dimensions: hazards, exposure, vulnerability, and resilience. Regression analysis is then applied to quantify the direction and magnitude of correlations between spatial-form indicators and the comprehensive risk index. The results reveal three major findings: (1) Disaster risk increases with fractal dimension, indicating that cities with more complex and irregular boundaries tend to be more vulnerable. In contrast, compactness has no statistically significant effect on disaster risk. (2) Spatial patterns are strongly associated with risk levels: cluster-type and block-type cities generally experience lower risks than radial-type and constellation-type cities. (3) City size and geography also influence risk, as larger cities typically exhibit lower risks, whereas southern cities face higher risks than those in northern regions. These results highlight the critical role of urban spatial structure in shaping disaster resilience. Managing boundary complexity, fostering polycentric and block-based spatial layouts, and improving road-network redundancy can effectively enhance urban adaptive capacity. These insights provide theoretical foundations and practical guidance for resilience-oriented spatial optimization and disaster-risk reduction in vulnerable cities.
Suggested Citation
Yunyan Li & Menghan Gou & Yanhong Wang & Binyan Wang & Chenhao Fang & Ziyi Wang & Tarek Rahmoun, 2025.
"What Kind of Urban Spatial Form Is More Conducive to Disaster Risk Reduction: An Empirical Analysis from 32 Cities in China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-34, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10291-:d:1796698
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10291-:d:1796698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.