IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i22p10236-d1795522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Analysis of Granular Flow Behavior for Sustainable Landslide Risk Management and Community Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Camilo Roman Quintero

    (Department of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
    Departamento de Ingeniería Civil y Agrícola, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá 111321, Colombia)

  • Mauricio Alberto Tapias Camacho

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Civil y Agrícola, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá 111321, Colombia)

  • Gustavo Chio Cho

    (Facultad de Ingenierías Físico-Mecánicas, Escuela de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Carrera 27 Calle 9, Bucaramanga 680002, Colombia)

Abstract

Sustainable landslide risk management is critical for achieving resilient communities and supporting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly in vulnerable mountainous regions of developing countries. This study presents experimental evidence supporting dimensionless analysis approaches for characterizing granular flow behavior, contributing to cost-effective landslide hazard assessment frameworks. We designed a 4 m experimental flume to investigate the influence of particle characteristics on flow velocity and runout distance, using two materials with contrasting shapes but similar density (~460 kg/m 3 ) and nominal size (~5 mm): uniform crystal beads (φ = 25.2°) and non-uniform crushed granite particles (φ = 36.9°). High-resolution imaging (30 fps, 2336 × 1752 pixels) captured 30 flow experiments from initiation to deposition. Results demonstrate significant differences in flow behavior: crystal beads achieved 50% longer runout distances and 46% higher maximum velocities (380 cm/s vs. 260 cm/s) compared to granite particles. The Savage number ( N s a v ) effectively captured fundamental flow-regime differences, with granite particles exhibiting values seven times lower than crystal beads (3.69 vs. 23.91, p < 0.001), indicating greater frictional energy dissipation relative to collisional energy transfer. The Bagnold number confirmed inertially dominated regimes ( N B a g > 10 6 ) with negligible viscous effects in both materials. These findings demonstrate that accessible material characterization using standard triaxial testing and dimensionless analysis can significantly improve landslide runout prediction accuracy, supporting evidence-based decision-making for sustainable territorial planning and community protection. This research supports the development of practical risk assessment methodologies implementable in resource-limited settings, promoting sustainable development through improved natural hazard management.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Camilo Roman Quintero & Mauricio Alberto Tapias Camacho & Gustavo Chio Cho, 2025. "Experimental Analysis of Granular Flow Behavior for Sustainable Landslide Risk Management and Community Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-24, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10236-:d:1795522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10236/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10236/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10236-:d:1795522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.