IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i22p10211-d1794954.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking Regional Sustainability: A National Perspective on Measurement and Evaluation (Based on Materials from Kazakhstan)

Author

Listed:
  • Ainagul Adambekova

    (Department of Management, School of Economics and Business, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 Al-Farabi Avenue, Almaty 050038, Kazakhstan)

  • Nurbek Adambekov

    (School of Economics and Management, Narxoz University, 55 Jandosov Street, Almaty 050035, Kazakhstan)

  • Meruyert Kulzhabayeva

    (School of Economics and Management, Narxoz University, 55 Jandosov Street, Almaty 050035, Kazakhstan)

  • Almas Appazov

    (Department of Management, School of Economics and Business, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 Al-Farabi Avenue, Almaty 050038, Kazakhstan)

  • Zhuldyz Adambekova

    (Higher School of Economics and Management, Caspian University, 521 Seifullin Ave., Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan)

  • Anara Ismagulova

    (School of Economics and Business, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050035, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Achieving the UN sustainable development goals is most effectively realized through the participation of each country and each individual region. Within the framework of regional governance, this requires aligning the social needs, economic feasibility, and environmental constraints of each region. Kazakhstan’s regions vary significantly in their levels of socio-economic progress, based on the differences in resources, infrastructure, population, and industry specialization. Currently, there is no clear system for assessing the feasibility of achieving the sustainable development goals in the country’s regions. This hinders the development of systemic measures to implement the SDGs and achieve the accepted commitments. This study aims to develop a methodology for rating regional development sustainability based on existing assessment methods and approaches. A study of leading global research and expert assessments served as the basis for the National Rating of Sustainable Development of Regions (NRSD), which was tested using empirical data from Kazakhstan. The results of the analysis of the economic and social development of regions confirmed the need to use environmental, social, and economic indicators as key criteria for the NRSD. The paper identifies the main limitations encountered during the research process, provides ways to mitigate them, and suggests paths to expand opportunities. The main emphasis is placed on recommendations for updating the methodology for collecting sustainable data at the regional level.

Suggested Citation

  • Ainagul Adambekova & Nurbek Adambekov & Meruyert Kulzhabayeva & Almas Appazov & Zhuldyz Adambekova & Anara Ismagulova, 2025. "Ranking Regional Sustainability: A National Perspective on Measurement and Evaluation (Based on Materials from Kazakhstan)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-27, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10211-:d:1794954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10211/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10211/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10211-:d:1794954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.