IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i22p10178-d1794142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification and Assessment of Risk Factors in Green Building Projects: A Multi-Dimensional Approach for Sustainable Infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Gamal AbdelHaffez

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt)

  • Mosbeh R. Kaloop

    (Digital Innovation Centre (DIC—DigInnoCent s.r.o), 46007 Liberecký, Czech Republic
    Digital Innovation Centre (DIC—Digital InnoCent Ltd.), London WC2A 2JR, UK
    Public Works Engineering Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt)

  • Mohamed Eldessouki

    (Digital Innovation Centre (DIC—DigInnoCent s.r.o), 46007 Liberecký, Czech Republic
    Digital Innovation Centre (DIC—Digital InnoCent Ltd.), London WC2A 2JR, UK)

  • Usama Hamed Issa

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This study establishes a structured framework to identify and evaluate risk factors that may hinder the achievement of sustainable development goals in green buildings and sustainable infrastructure projects. Fifty-six risk factors are identified and categorized into four risk groups, including stakeholder and management, financial and economic, technological and resource, and process and regulatory risks. The risk factors are evaluated across four risk indices related to probability of occurrence, manageability, impact on building performance, and project cost. Further, the severity of risks based on combining the four indices’ effects is quantified using a new Green Risk Index (GRI), while the relationships among all risk indices are determined. The strongest positive correlation is observed between the probability and the impact on cost, whereas a negative relationship is found between the probability and manageability. The analysis demonstrates that a risk factor related to the lack of knowledge about energy-saving procedures and environmental concerns during the design phase is the most critical, as it has the highest severity based on the GRI. “Non-compliance with environmental standards in project design” is also identified as a critical risk factor due to its high effect on building performance. Additionally, the risk factor associated with unstable funds from investors shows the highest effect on manageability. Process and regulatory is identified as the most critical risk group, encompassing the maximum number of key risk factors, and has the highest average weight related to the GRI. These findings reveal crucial vulnerabilities and underline the importance of targeted strategies to strengthen the use of nature-based solution frameworks for mitigating the risk effects in green buildings and sustainable infrastructures.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Gamal AbdelHaffez & Mosbeh R. Kaloop & Mohamed Eldessouki & Usama Hamed Issa, 2025. "Identification and Assessment of Risk Factors in Green Building Projects: A Multi-Dimensional Approach for Sustainable Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-26, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10178-:d:1794142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10178/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10178/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10178-:d:1794142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.