IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i22p10116-d1793086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Scenario Emission Reduction Potential Assessment and Cost–Benefit Analysis of Motor Vehicles at the Provincial Level in China Based on the LEAP Model: Implication for Sustainable Transportation Transitions

Author

Listed:
  • Jiarong Li

    (Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention (LAP 3 ), Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China)

  • Yijing Wang

    (Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention (LAP 3 ), Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China)

  • Rong Wang

    (Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention (LAP 3 ), Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
    Integrated Research on Disaster Risk-International Center of Excellence on Risk Interconnectivity and Governance on Weather/Climate Extremes Impact and Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
    Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
    Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Atmosphere-Ocean Interaction, Shanghai 200438, China)

Abstract

With the continuous expansion in China’s vehicle fleet, emissions of CO 2 and air pollutants from the on-road transportation sector are widely projected to be rising, posing a challenge to realizing China’s targets of carbon peaking in 2030 and carbon neutrality in 2060, as well as the national target for air quality improvement. Therefore, vehicle electrification in the on-road transportation sector is urgently needed to reduce emissions of CO 2 and air pollutants, as it serves as a key pathway to align transportation development with sustainability goals. While vehicle electrification is supposed to be the primary solution, there is a research gap in quantifying the provincial, environmental, and economic impacts of implementing such a policy in China. To bridge this gap, we projected the provincial-level ownership of different types of vehicles based on historical trends, assessed the emission reduction potential for CO 2 and air pollutants using the LEAP model from 2021 to 2060, and predicted the provincial marginal abatement costs at different mitigation stages under various scenarios with different strategies of vehicle electrification and development patterns of electricity structure. Our results show that the implementation of vehicle electrification lowers the national carbon peak by 0.2–0.6 Gt yr −1 and advances its achievement by 1–3 years ahead of 2030. The marginal abatement cost ranges from $532 to $3466 per ton CO 2 (tCO 2 −1 ) in 2025 and from −$180 to −$113 tCO 2 −1 in 2060 across scenarios. The provincial marginal abatement cost curves further indicate that China’s vehicle electrification should be prioritized in cost-effective regions (e.g., Shanghai and Guangdong), while concurrently advancing nationwide grid decarbonization to guarantee the supply of low-carbon electricity across the country. This optimized pathway ensures that transportation decarbonization aligns with both environmental and economic requirements, providing actionable support for China’s sustainable development strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiarong Li & Yijing Wang & Rong Wang, 2025. "Multi-Scenario Emission Reduction Potential Assessment and Cost–Benefit Analysis of Motor Vehicles at the Provincial Level in China Based on the LEAP Model: Implication for Sustainable Transportation ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-24, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10116-:d:1793086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10116-:d:1793086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.