Author
Listed:
- Ruiying Yang
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Wenxin Kang
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Yiwei Lu
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Jiaqi Liu
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Boya Wang
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Zhicheng Liu
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
Abstract
A core challenge in urban green space (UGS) management lies in precisely identifying public demand heterogeneity toward landscape elements. Grounded in Expectation Confirmation Theory (ECT), this study aims to systematically identify the key landscape elements shaping public satisfaction and elucidate their driving mechanisms to inform UGS planning. Using 107 UGS in central Beijing as case studies, this study first retrieved 712,969 social media data (SMD) from multiple online platforms. A landscape element lexicon derived from these data was then integrated with the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model to assess public attention and satisfaction toward the natural, cultural, and artificial attributes of UGS, achieving an accuracy of 84.4%. Finally, spatial variations and the effects of different landscape elements on public satisfaction were analyzed using GIS-based visualization, K-means clustering, and multiple linear regression. Key findings reveal the following: (1) satisfaction follows a “core-periphery” gradient, peaking in heritage-rich City Wall Parks (>0.63) and plunging in green belts due to imbalanced element configurations (~0.04); (2) naturally dominant green spaces contribute most to satisfaction, while a nonlinear relationship exists between element dominance and satisfaction: strong features enhance perception, balanced patterns mask issues; (3) regression analysis confirms natural elements (vegetation β = 0.280, water β = 0.173) as core satisfaction drivers, whereas artificial facilities (e.g., service infrastructure β = 0.112, p > 0.05) exhibit a high frequency but low satisfaction paradox. These insights culminate in a practical implementation framework for policymakers: first, establish a data-driven monitoring system to flag high-frequency, low-satisfaction facilities; second, prioritize budgeting for enhancing natural elements and contextualizing cultural elements; and finally, implement site-specific optimization based on primary UGS functions to counteract green space homogenization in high-density cities.
Suggested Citation
Ruiying Yang & Wenxin Kang & Yiwei Lu & Jiaqi Liu & Boya Wang & Zhicheng Liu, 2025.
"Impact of Landscape Elements on Public Satisfaction in Beijing’s Urban Green Spaces Using Social Media and Expectation Confirmation Theory,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-25, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10107-:d:1792915
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10107-:d:1792915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.