IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i22p10088-d1792457.html

Return of Ancient Wheats, Emmer and Einkorn, a Pesticide-Free Alternative for a More Sustainable Agriculture—A Summary of a Comprehensive Analysis from Central Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Szilvia Bencze

    (ÖMKi, Hungarian Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, 1038 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Ferenc Bakos

    (ÖMKi, Hungarian Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, 1038 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Péter Mikó

    (Agricultural Institute, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, 2462 Martonvásár, Hungary)

  • Mihály Földi

    (ÖMKi, Hungarian Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, 1038 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Magdaléna Lacko-Bartošová

    (Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, 949 76 Nitra-Chrenová, Slovakia)

  • Nuri Nurlaila Setiawan

    (ÖMKi, Hungarian Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, 1038 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Anna Katalin Fekete

    (ÖMKi, Hungarian Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, 1038 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Dóra Drexler

    (ÖMKi, Hungarian Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, 1038 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Conventional agriculture, focusing on productivity rather than sustainability, have long abandoned hulled wheats. With them not only striking genetic diversity but valuable, health-promoting food sources became lost. Although einkorn and emmer—two of the most ancient wheat species—are generally considered good candidates of sustainable agriculture especially for pesticide-free cropping, they have remained largely unrecognized. To assess their agronomic potential in comparison with modern wheats grown under the same conditions, comprehensive research was conducted, combining multi-location participatory on-farm and small-plot trials. Our findings confirmed that most landraces of emmer and einkorn exhibited strong weed suppression ability, making them suitable for organic cultivation, and effective resistance against diseases—including Fusarium spp. and associated deoxynivalenol (DON) mycotoxin accumulation. Both species were entirely avoided by cereal leaf beetles ( Oulema spp.) and had, on average, 2.6% more grain protein content than common wheat. Although they command significantly higher market prices, their (hulled) yields were comparable to modern wheat only in extreme years or at sites typically producing 3–5 t/ha of wheat. Nevertheless, the cultivation of emmer and einkorn presents a more sustainable "sow-and-harvest" alternative, free from pesticide and mycotoxin residue risks, while also enhances biodiversity from the field to the table.

Suggested Citation

  • Szilvia Bencze & Ferenc Bakos & Péter Mikó & Mihály Földi & Magdaléna Lacko-Bartošová & Nuri Nurlaila Setiawan & Anna Katalin Fekete & Dóra Drexler, 2025. "Return of Ancient Wheats, Emmer and Einkorn, a Pesticide-Free Alternative for a More Sustainable Agriculture—A Summary of a Comprehensive Analysis from Central Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10088-:d:1792457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10088/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10088/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10088-:d:1792457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.