IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i22p10067-d1792097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy Assessment of Remote Sensing Forest Height Retrieval for Sustainable Forest Management: A Case Study of Shangri-La

Author

Listed:
  • Haoxiang Xu

    (Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Xiaoqing Zuo

    (Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Yongfa Li

    (Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Xu Yang

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Kunming University, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Yuran Zhang

    (Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Yunchuan Li

    (Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

Abstract

Forest height is a critical parameter for understanding ecosystem functions, assessing carbon stocks, and supporting sustainable forest management. Its accurate measurement is essential for climate change mitigation and understanding the global carbon cycle. While traditional methods like field surveys and airborne LiDAR provide accurate measurements, their high costs and limited spatial coverage make them impractical for the large-scale, dynamic monitoring required for effective sustainability initiatives. This research presents a multi-source remote sensing fusion approach to tackle this problem. For regional forest height inversion, it includes Sentinel-1 SAR, Sentinel-2 multispectral images, ICESat-2 lidar, and SRTM DEM data. Sentinel-1 + ICESat-2 + SRTM, Sentinel-2 + ICESat-2 + SRTM, and Sentinel-1 + Sentinel-2 + ICESat-2 + SRTM were the three data combination methods built using Shangri-La Second-class Category Resource Survey data as ground truth. An accuracy assessment was performed using three machine learning models: Light Gradient Boosting (LightGBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Random Forest (RF). Based on the results, the ideal configuration using the LightGBM model and the following sensors: Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, ICESat-2, and SRTM yields a correlation coefficient of 0.72, an R M S E of 5.52 m, and an M A E of 4.08 m. The XGBoost model obtained r = 0.716, R M S E = 5.55 m, and M A E = 4.10 m using the same data combination as the Random Forest model, which produced r = 0.706, R M S E = 5.63 m, and M A E = 4.16 m. The multi-source comprehensive fusion technique produced the greatest results; however, including either Sentinel-1 or Sentinel-2 enhances model performance, according to comparisons across multiple data combinations. This work presents an efficient technological strategy for monitoring forest height in complex terrains, thereby providing a scalable and robust methodological reference for supporting sustainable forest management and large-scale ecological assessment. The proposed multi-source spatiotemporal fusion framework, coupled with systematic model evaluation, demonstrates significant potential for operational applications, especially in regions with limited LiDAR coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Haoxiang Xu & Xiaoqing Zuo & Yongfa Li & Xu Yang & Yuran Zhang & Yunchuan Li, 2025. "Accuracy Assessment of Remote Sensing Forest Height Retrieval for Sustainable Forest Management: A Case Study of Shangri-La," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10067-:d:1792097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10067/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10067/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10067-:d:1792097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.