IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i22p10050-d1791735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Conflict-Coordination Framework for Constructing Living Shorelines: A Case Study of Ecological Seawalls

Author

Listed:
  • Jiali Gu

    (Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics & Estuary (Zhejiang Institute of Marine Planning and Design), Hangzhou 310020, China
    Yangtze River Delta Estuarine Tidal Bore-Geomorphology-Ecology Observation and Research Station, Ministry of Water Resources, Hangzhou 310020, China)

  • Xiaoran Wei

    (Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics & Estuary (Zhejiang Institute of Marine Planning and Design), Hangzhou 310020, China
    Yangtze River Delta Estuarine Tidal Bore-Geomorphology-Ecology Observation and Research Station, Ministry of Water Resources, Hangzhou 310020, China)

  • Yu Han

    (Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics & Estuary (Zhejiang Institute of Marine Planning and Design), Hangzhou 310020, China
    Yangtze River Delta Estuarine Tidal Bore-Geomorphology-Ecology Observation and Research Station, Ministry of Water Resources, Hangzhou 310020, China)

  • Jian Zeng

    (Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics & Estuary (Zhejiang Institute of Marine Planning and Design), Hangzhou 310020, China
    Yangtze River Delta Estuarine Tidal Bore-Geomorphology-Ecology Observation and Research Station, Ministry of Water Resources, Hangzhou 310020, China)

  • Miao Hu

    (Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics & Estuary (Zhejiang Institute of Marine Planning and Design), Hangzhou 310020, China)

  • Zheng Gong

    (College of Harbour, Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

Abstract

While coastal zones support economic and social development, they also face prominent contradictions between shoreline utilization and ecological protection. This study proposed an innovative conflict-coordination framework for constructing living shorelines, aiming to identify and mitigate multi-dimensional conflicts in coastal engineering. The framework introduced a four-dimensional conflict analysis structure encompassing policy, social environment, ecological environment, and technical capacity, thereby extending beyond traditional single-dimensional or ecological-only assessments. Furthermore, it integrated the Comprehensive Conflict Index (CCI) with a multi-objective coordination model that couples three core indicators (e.g., whole-life-cycle carbon emissions, comprehensive impact intensity, and the living shoreline index) to achieve synergistic optimization among lower carbon emission, less human intervention, and higher ecological function objectives. Applied to an ecological restoration and seawall ecologization project in Zhenhai District, Ningbo, the results demonstrated that the framework helped constructing living shorelines by effectively reducing comprehensive conflict intensity with 21.2%, decreasing total carbon emissions with 60.2%, and significantly improving both the living shoreline index and multi-objective coordination level. Compared to traditional coastal zone assessment methods, these findings highlighted the differentiated advantages of the proposed framework in quantifying conflict sources, enhancing coordination among multi-objectives, and providing scientific support for living shoreline construction and sustainable coastal management.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiali Gu & Xiaoran Wei & Yu Han & Jian Zeng & Miao Hu & Zheng Gong, 2025. "A Conflict-Coordination Framework for Constructing Living Shorelines: A Case Study of Ecological Seawalls," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10050-:d:1791735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10050/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10050/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10050-:d:1791735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.