IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9916-d1789277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practice Primacy: Revisiting the Knowledge–Action Gap in Pro-Environmental Behavior with eXplainable AI

Author

Listed:
  • Xun Yang

    (College of Economics and Management, Zhejiang A&F University, No.252 Yijin Street, Lin’an District, Hangzhou 311300, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Shensheng Chen

    (Zhejiang Provincial Institute of Rural Revitalization, No.666 Wusu Street, Lin’an District, Hangzhou 311300, China
    Logistics Service Center of Zhejiang A&F University, No.666 Wusu Street, Lin’an District, Hangzhou 311300, China)

  • Tingting Liu

    (Logistics Service Center of Zhejiang A&F University, No.666 Wusu Street, Lin’an District, Hangzhou 311300, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Junjie Luo

    (College of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, No.666 Wusu Street, Lin’an District, Hangzhou 311300, China
    Institute of Ecological Civilization & Carbon Neutrality, Zhejiang A&F University, No.666 Wusu Street, Lin’an District, Hangzhou 311300, China)

  • Yuzhen Tang

    (Logistics Service Center of Zhejiang A&F University, No.666 Wusu Street, Lin’an District, Hangzhou 311300, China)

Abstract

Against the backdrop of an escalating global environmental crisis, bridging the “knowledge–action gap” in the pro-environmental behavior (PEB) of university students has become a key challenge for sustainable development education, aligning with SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) and SDG 13 (Climate Action). Traditional linear models often struggle to capture the complex non-linearities and interaction effects when explaining this gap. To overcome this limitation, this study introduces an integrated “prediction-plus-explanation” framework using eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Based on survey data from 463 university students in China, we constructed a high-precision PEB prediction model (Accuracy = 93.55%) using the CatBoost algorithm and conducted an in-depth analysis of its internal decision-making mechanisms with the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) framework. The results reveal that a “Practice Primacy” model plays a dominant role in driving PEB: the formation of environmental habits, participation in environmental practices, and the investment of related resources are the overwhelmingly dominant factors in predicting individual behavior, with their cumulative contribution far exceeding that of traditional cognitive and attitudinal variables. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis revealed significant group differences in these driving mechanisms: the behavioral decisions of male students tend to be more “value-driven,” while lower-division students are more susceptible to external educational interventions. By quantifying the non-linear effects and relative importance of each driver, this study offers a new “Action-to-Cognition” perspective for bridging the knowledge–action gap and provides robust, data-driven support for universities to design precise and differentiated intervention strategies, thus contributing to the achievement of SDGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xun Yang & Shensheng Chen & Tingting Liu & Junjie Luo & Yuzhen Tang, 2025. "Practice Primacy: Revisiting the Knowledge–Action Gap in Pro-Environmental Behavior with eXplainable AI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-30, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9916-:d:1789277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9916/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9916/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9916-:d:1789277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.