IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9865-d1787941.html

Biodiversity, Heritage and Ecosystem Service Potential of Woody Taxa in Scattered Built Environments of Traditional Agricultural Landscapes

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Đorđević

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Attila Tóth

    (Institute of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia)

  • Gabriel Kuczman

    (Institute of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia)

  • Jelena Čukanović

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Mirjana Ljubojević

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Mirjana Ocokoljić

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Kneza Višeslava 1, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Djurdja Petrov

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Kneza Višeslava 1, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Saša Orlović

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
    Institute of Lowland Forestry and Environment, University of Novi Sad, Antona Čehova 13d, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

Abstract

Agricultural landscapes often exhibit low tree cover and homogeneity, leading to various environmental challenges. Traditional farmsteads, as scattered built environments in agricultural landscapes with diverse woody vegetation, enhance ecological heterogeneity and provide significant ecosystem services (ES), yet their dendroflora remains understudied. This study assesses woody vegetation on ten traditional farmsteads in Vojvodina, Serbia as case studies, through field surveys of woody species, biodiversity indices, GIS-based spatial analyses, and classification of species according to functional and ecosystem-related traits, offering insights into ecological patterns within these landscapes. The analysis examines species composition, abundance, origin, structural traits (tree cover, density, age, height, and crown width), and functional roles in ES provision. The vegetation shows potential to contribute to ES, especially through melliferous species (about 80%), food sources (about 82% for humans; 91% for birds, 91% for small mammals, 87% for domestic animals), and windbreak functions (about 76%). Phytoncide-producing species (about 62%) suggest a potential provision of air quality benefits, while entomophilous species (about 83%) indicate a potential provision of pollination support. Traditional farmsteads support biodiversity conservation, habitat provision, and preservation of genetic resources, particularly through old and rare species. Integrating these systems into agroforestry and biodiversity-friendly practices may increase ecological resilience and balance in intensive farming areas. Recognising traditional farmsteads as biodiversity reservoirs is vital for sustainable land use, and for conserving cultural and natural heritage within agricultural landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Đorđević & Attila Tóth & Gabriel Kuczman & Jelena Čukanović & Mirjana Ljubojević & Mirjana Ocokoljić & Djurdja Petrov & Saša Orlović, 2025. "Biodiversity, Heritage and Ecosystem Service Potential of Woody Taxa in Scattered Built Environments of Traditional Agricultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-28, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9865-:d:1787941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9865/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9865/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9865-:d:1787941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.