IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9844-d1787489.html

Optimalization of Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilization of Hypoallergenic Winter Wheat Lines

Author

Listed:
  • Bogdan Kulig

    (Department of Agroecology and Plant Production, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Av. Mickiewicz Adam 21, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

  • Andrzej Oleksy

    (Department of Agroecology and Plant Production, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Av. Mickiewicz Adam 21, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

  • Marcin Rapacz

    (Department of Plant Breeding, Physiology and Seed Science, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Av. Mickiewicz Adam 21, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Klimek-Kopyra

    (Department of Agroecology and Plant Production, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Av. Mickiewicz Adam 21, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

  • Andrzej Lepiarczyk

    (Department of Agroecology and Plant Production, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Av. Mickiewicz Adam 21, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

  • Barbara Filipek-Mazur

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Av. Mickiewicz Adam 21, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

This study evaluated the response of two winter wheat lines: hypoallergenic wasko.gl− and control line wasko.gl+ to nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) fertilization under field conditions in southern Poland during 2019–2021. A split-split-plot design with six N doses (0–120 kg ha −1 ) and three S doses (0, 20, 40 kg ha −1 ) was applied to assess grain yield, nitrogen agronomic efficiency (NAE), vegetation indices (LAI, NDVI), and grain protein content. Grain yields ranged from 3.92 to 6.08 Mg ha −1 , with the hypoallergenic line producing on average 16.6% more than the control one. Nitrogen fertilization significantly increased yields up to 80–100 kg N ha −1 , while sulfur application showed no consistent yield effect. The highest NAE was achieved at 80 kg N ha −1 , reaching 13.7 kg grain kg −1 N for hypoallergenic and 19.6 kg grain kg −1 N for the control wheat line. Remote sensing indices correlated with fertilization intensity; LAI and NDVI increased up to 80–100 kg N ha −1 , with optimal values differing between lines, confirming distinct nitrogen-use efficiencies. Grain protein content increased systematically with higher N inputs, exceeding 145.6 g kg −1 DM at 120 kg N ha −1 ; sulfur fertilization modified protein levels, with the optimal dose being 20 kg S ha −1 for the hypoallergenic line and 40 kg S ha −1 for the allergenic line. Results demonstrate that nitrogen supply strongly influences yield and quality traits, whereas sulfur plays a secondary role, particularly in modifying protein content in grains. Differences in genotype responses to fertilization emphasize the importance of taking an individualized approach to nitrogen and sulfur fertilization strategies, which are tailored to specific lines of wheat. This optimizes fertilization, yield, and quality, while maintaining environmental sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Bogdan Kulig & Andrzej Oleksy & Marcin Rapacz & Agnieszka Klimek-Kopyra & Andrzej Lepiarczyk & Barbara Filipek-Mazur, 2025. "Optimalization of Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilization of Hypoallergenic Winter Wheat Lines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9844-:d:1787489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9844/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9844/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9844-:d:1787489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.