IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9808-d1786894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Material Flow Analysis of Wood Resources: A Review of Current Practices in EU and Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Hongjun Wang

    (Chair of Timber Structures and Building Construction, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Atsushi Takano

    (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Kagoshima University, 1-21-24 Korimoto, Kagoshima 890-8580, Japan)

  • Stefan Winter

    (Chair of Timber Structures and Building Construction, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333 Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Wood and wood-based products are increasingly recognized for their renewability and carbon storage capacity, supporting sustainable development and circular economy goals in the EU. This paper provides a comprehensive review of 42 material flow analysis (MFA) studies on wood resources conducted in the European Union and Switzerland between 2000 and 2024, introducing a five-level data risk classification. It examines how MFA is applied, including system boundaries, data sources, unit consistency, flow representation, and uncertainty handling. Results show that while volume-based units and Sankey diagrams are widely used, there is substantial variation in terminology, data quality, and methodology. The building stage is frequently excluded, limiting the completeness of wood flow assessments. Key challenges include restricted data access, inconsistent spatial and temporal scales, and varying levels of data processing risk. The study recommends harmonized units and terminology, open-access databases, standardization in visualization practices, and ultimately a wood-specific MFA framework to improve data quality, comparability, and policy relevance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongjun Wang & Atsushi Takano & Stefan Winter, 2025. "Material Flow Analysis of Wood Resources: A Review of Current Practices in EU and Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9808-:d:1786894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9808/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9808/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9808-:d:1786894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.